[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 47, Volume 2]

[Revised as of October 1, 2004]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 47CFR25.148]



[Page 305-306]

 

                       TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION

 

                    CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

                         COMMISSION (CONTINUED)

 

PART 25_SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS--Table of Contents

 

                   Subpart B_Applications and Licenses

 

Sec. 25.148  Licensing provisions for the Direct Broadcast Satellite 

Service.



    (a) License terms. License terms for DBS facilities are specified in 

Sec. 25.121(a).

    (b) Due diligence. (1) All persons granted DBS authorizations shall 

proceed with due diligence in constructing DBS systems. Permittees shall 

be required to complete contracting for construction of the satellite 

station(s) within one year of the grant of the authorization. The 

satellite stations shall also be required to be in operation within six 

years of the authorization grant.

    (2) In addition to the requirements stated in paragraph (b)(1) of 

this section, all persons who receive new or additional DBS 

authorizations after January 19, 1996 shall complete construction of the 

first satellite in their respective DBS systems within four years of 

grant of the authorization. All satellite stations in such a DBS system 

shall be in operation within six years of the grant of the 

authorization.

    (3) DBS licensees shall be required to proceed consistent with all 

applicable due diligence obligations, unless otherwise determined by the 

Commission upon proper showing in any particular case. Transfer of 

control of the authorization shall not be considered to justify 

extension of these deadlines.

    (c) Geographic service requirements. Those entities acquiring DBS 

authorizations after January 19, 1996, or who



[[Page 306]]



after January 19, 1996 modify a previous DBS authorization to launch a 

replacement satellite, must provide DBS service to Alaska and Hawaii 

where such service is technically feasible from the authorized orbital 

location. This requirement does not apply to DBS satellites authorized 

to operate at the 61.5[deg] W.L. orbital location. DBS applicants 

seeking to operate from locations other than 61.5[deg] W.L. who do not 

provide service to Alaska and Hawaii, must provide technical analyses to 

the Commission demonstrating that such service is not feasible as a 

technical matter, or that while technically feasible such services would 

require so many compromises in satellite design and operation as to make 

it economically unreasonable.

    (d) DBS subject to competitive bidding. Mutually exclusive initial 

applications to provide DBS are subject to competitive bidding 

procedures. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 

1, subpart Q of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in 

this part.

    (e) DBS long form application. Winning bidders are subject to the 

provisions of Sec. 1.2107 of this chapter except that in lieu of a FCC 

Form 601 each winning bidder shall submit the long-form satellite 

service application (FCC Form 312) within thirty (30) days after being 

notified by Public Notice that it is the winning bidder. Each winning 

bidder will also be required to submit by the same deadline the 

information described in Sec. 25.215 (Technical) and Sec. 25.601 

(EEO), and in paragraph (f) of this section. Each winner also will be 

required to file, by the same deadline, a signed statement describing 

its efforts to date and future plans to come into compliance with any 

applicable spectrum limitations, if it is not already in compliance. 

Such information shall be submitted pursuant to the procedures set forth 

in Sec. 25.114 and any associated Public Notices.

    (f) Technical qualifications. DBS operations must be in accordance 

with the sharing criteria and technical characteristics contained in 

Appendices 30 and 30A of the ITU's Radio Regulations. Operation of 

systems using differing technical characteristics may be permitted, with 

adequate technical showing, and if a request has been made to the ITU to 

modify the appropriate Plans to include the system's technical 

parameters.



[67 FR 51113, Aug. 7, 2002]