[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 49, Volume 8]
[Revised as of October 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 49CFR1503.233]

[Page 269-271]
 
                        TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION
 
   CHAPTER XII--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF 
                            HOMELAND SECURITY
 
PART 1503_INVESTIGATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES--Table of Contents
 
 Subpart G_Rules of Practice in Transportation Security Administration 
                       (TSA) Civil Penalty Actions
 
Sec. 1503.233  Appeal from initial decision.

    (a) Notice of appeal. A party may appeal the initial decision, and 
any decision not previously appealed pursuant to Sec. 1503.219, by 
filing a notice of appeal with the Enforcement Docket Clerk. A party 
must file the notice of appeal with the U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security, Transportation Security Administration, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, TSA-2, Attention: Enforcement Docket Clerk, 601 South 12th 
Street, Arlington, VA 22202-4220. A party must file the notice of appeal 
not later than 10 days after entry of the oral initial decision on the 
record or service of the written initial decision on the parties and 
must serve a copy of the notice of appeal on each party.
    (b) Issues on appeal. A party may appeal only the following issues:
    (1) Whether each finding of fact is supported by a preponderance of 
reliable, probative, and substantial evidence;
    (2) Whether each conclusion of law is made in accordance with 
applicable law, precedent, and public policy; and
    (3) Whether the administrative law judge committed any prejudicial 
errors during the hearing that support the appeal.
    (c) Perfecting an appeal. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a 
party must perfect an appeal, not later than 50 days after entry of the 
oral initial decision on the record or service of the written initial 
decision on the party, by filing an appeal brief with the Enforcement 
Docket Clerk.
    (1) Extension of time by agreement of the parties. The parties may 
agree to extend the time for perfecting the appeal with the consent of 
the TSA decision maker. If the TSA decision maker grants an extension of 
time to perfect the appeal, the Enforcement Docket Clerk will serve a 
letter confirming the extension of time on each party.
    (2) Written motion for extension. If the parties do not agree to an 
extension of time for perfecting an appeal, a party desiring an 
extension of time may file a written motion for an extension with the 
Enforcement Docket Clerk and must serve a copy of the motion on each 
party. The TSA decision maker may grant an extension if good cause for 
the extension is shown in the motion.
    (d) Appeal briefs. A party must file the appeal brief with the TSA 
Enforcement Docket Clerk and must serve a copy of the appeal brief on 
each party.
    (1) A party must set forth, in detail, the party's specific 
objections to the initial decision or rulings in the appeal brief. A 
party also must set forth, in detail, the basis for the appeal, the 
reasons supporting the appeal, and the relief requested in the appeal. 
If the party relies on evidence contained in the record for the appeal, 
the party must specifically refer to the pertinent evidence contained in 
the transcript in the appeal brief.
    (2) The TSA decision maker may dismiss an appeal, on the TSA 
decision maker's own initiative or upon motion of any other party, where 
a party has filed a notice of appeal but fails to perfect the appeal by 
timely filing an appeal brief.
    (e) Reply brief. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, any party 
may file a reply brief not later than 35 days after the appeal brief has 
been served on that party. The party filing the reply brief must serve a 
copy of the reply brief on each party. If the party relies on evidence 
contained in the record for the reply, the party must specifically refer 
to the pertinent evidence contained in the transcript in the reply 
brief.
    (1) Extension of time by agreement of the parties. The parties may 
agree to

[[Page 270]]

extend the time for filing a reply brief with the consent of the TSA 
decision maker. If the TSA decision maker grants an extension of time to 
file the reply brief, the Enforcement Docket Clerk will serve a letter 
confirming the extension of time on each party.
    (2) Written motion for extension. If the parties do not agree to an 
extension of time for filing a reply brief, a party desiring an 
extension of time may file a written motion for an extension and will 
serve a copy of the motion on each party. The TSA decision maker may 
grant an extension if good cause for the extension is shown in the 
motion.
    (f) Other briefs. The TSA decision maker may allow any person to 
submit an amicus curiae brief in an appeal of an initial decision. A 
party may not file more than one appeal brief or reply brief. A party 
may petition the TSA decision maker, in writing, for leave to file an 
additional brief and must serve a copy of the petition on each party. 
The party may not file the additional brief with the petition. The TSA 
decision maker may grant leave to file an additional brief if the party 
demonstrates good cause for allowing additional argument on the appeal. 
The TSA decision maker will allow a reasonable time for the party to 
file the additional brief.
    (g) Number of copies. A party must file the original appeal brief or 
the original reply brief, and two copies of the brief, with the 
Enforcement Docket Clerk.
    (h) Oral argument. The TSA decision maker has sole discretion to 
permit oral argument on the appeal. On the TSA decision maker's own 
initiative or upon written motion by any party, the TSA decision maker 
may find that oral argument will contribute substantially to the 
development of the issues on appeal and may grant the parties an 
opportunity for oral argument.
    (i) Waiver of objections on appeal. If a party fails to object to 
any alleged error regarding the proceedings in an appeal or a reply 
brief, the party waives any objection to the alleged error. The TSA 
decision maker is not required to consider any objection in an appeal 
brief or any argument in the reply brief if a party's objection is based 
on evidence contained on the record and the party does not specifically 
refer to the pertinent evidence from the record in the brief.
    (j) The TSA decision maker's decision on appeal. The TSA decision 
maker will review the briefs on appeal and the oral argument, if any, to 
determine if the administrative law judge committed prejudicial error in 
the proceedings or that the initial decision should be affirmed, 
modified, or reversed. The TSA decision maker may affirm, modify, or 
reverse the initial decision, make any necessary findings, or may remand 
the case for any proceedings that the TSA decision maker determines may 
be necessary.
    (1) The TSA decision maker may raise any issue, on the TSA decision 
maker's own initiative, that is required for proper disposition of the 
proceedings. The TSA decision maker will give the parties a reasonable 
opportunity to submit arguments on the new issues before making a 
decision on appeal. If an issue raised by the TSA decision maker 
requires the consideration of additional testimony or evidence, the TSA 
decision maker will remand the case to the administrative law judge for 
further proceedings and an initial decision related to that issue. If an 
issue raised by the TSA decision maker is solely an issue of law or the 
issue was addressed at the hearing but was not raised by a party in the 
briefs on appeal, a remand of the case to the administrative law judge 
for further proceedings is not required but may be provided in the 
discretion of the TSA decision maker.
    (2) The TSA decision maker will issue the final decision and order 
of the Administrator on appeal in writing and will serve a copy of the 
decision and order on each party. Unless a petition for review is filed 
pursuant to Sec. 1503.235, a final decision and order of the 
Administrator will be considered an order assessing civil penalty if the 
TSA decision maker finds that an alleged violation occurred and a civil 
penalty is warranted.
    (3) A final decision and order of the Administrator after appeal is 
precedent in any other civil penalty action. Any issue, finding or 
conclusion, order, ruling, or initial decision of an administrative law 
judge that has not been appealed to the TSA decision maker is

[[Page 271]]

not precedent in any other civil penalty action.
    (4) The TSA decision maker will determine whether the decision and 
order of the TSA decision maker, with the administrative law judge's 
initial decision or order attached, may be released to the public, 
either in whole or in redacted form. In making this determination, the 
TSA decision maker will consider whether disclosure of any of the 
information in the decision and order would be detrimental to 
transportation safety, would not be in the public interest, or should 
not otherwise be required to be made available to the public.

[67 FR 51483, Aug. 8, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 49720, Aug. 19, 2003; 68 
FR 58281, Oct. 9, 2003]