[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 29, Volume 9]
[Revised as of July 1, 2005]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 29CFR1990.144]

[Page 235-236]
 
                             TITLE 29--LABOR
 
CHAPTER XVII--OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT 
                          OF LABOR (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1990_IDENTIFICATION, CLAS SI FI CA TION, AND REG U LA TION OF 
PO TEN TIAL OC CU PA TION AL CAR CIN O GENS--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1990.144  Criteria for consideration of arguments on certain issues.

    Arguments on the following issues will be considered by the 
Secretary in identifying or classifying any substance pursuant to this 
part, if evidence for the specific substance subject to the rulemaking 
conforms to the following criteria. Such arguments and evidence will be 
evaluated based upon scientific and policy judgments.
    (a) Non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic studies. 
Non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic studies regarding 
the substance subject to the rulemaking or to a similar or closely 
related substance will be considered by the Secretary only if they meet 
the following criteria:

    Criteria. (i) The epidemiologic study involved at least 20 years' 
exposure of a group of subjects to the substance and at least 30 years' 
observation of the subjects after initial exposure;
    (ii) Documented reasons are provided for predicting the site(s) at 
which the substance would induce cancer if it were carcinogenic in 
humans; and
    (iii) The group of exposed subjects was large enough for an increase 
in cancer incidence of 50% above that in unexposed controls to have been 
detected at any of the predicted sites.


Arguments that non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic 
studies should be used to establish numerical upper limits on potential 
risks to humans exposed to specific levels of a substance will be 
considered only if criteria (i) and (ii) are met and, in addition:

    (iv) Specific data on the level of exposure of the group of workers 
are provided, based either on direct measurements made periodically 
throughout the period of exposure, or upon other data which provide 
reliable evidence of the magnitude of exposure.

    (b) Tumors induced at site of administration. Arguments that tumors 
at the site of administration should not be considered will be 
considered only if:
    (i) The route of administration is not oral, respiratory or dermal; 
and
    (ii) Evidence is provided which establishes that induction of local 
tumors is related to the physical configuration or formulation of the 
material administered (e.g., crystalline form or dimensions of a solid 
material, or matrix of an impregnated implant) and that tumors are not 
induced when the same material is administered in a different 
configuration or formula.
    (c) Metabolic differences. Arguments that differences in metabolic 
profiles can be used to demonstrate that a chemical found positive in an 
experimental study in a mammalian species would pose no potential 
carcinogenic

[[Page 236]]

risk to exposed workers will be considered by the Secretary only if the 
evidence presented for the specific substance subject to the rulemaking 
meets the following criteria:

    Criteria. (i) A complete metabolic profile, including identities of 
trace metabolites, is presented for the experimental animal species;
    (ii) A complete metabolic profile, including identities of trace 
metabolites, is available for a human population group representative of 
those who are occupationally exposed;
    (iii) Documented evidence is provided for ascribing the carcinogenic 
activity of the substance in the test animal species to metabolite(s) 
produced only in that species and not in humans; and
    (iv) Documented evidence is provided to show that other metabolites 
produced also in humans have been adequately tested and have not been 
shown to be carcinogenic.

    (d) Use of high doses in animal testing. Arguments that positive 
results obtained in carcinogenesis bioassays with experimental animals 
subjected to high doses of a substance are not relevant to potential 
carcinogenic risks to exposed workers will be considered by the 
Secretary only if the evidence for the specific substance subject to the 
rulemaking meets the following criteria:

    Criteria. (i) Documented evidence is presented to show that the 
substance in question is metabolized by the experimental animal species 
exposed at the dose levels used in the bioassay(s) to metabolic products 
which include one or more that are not produced in the same species at 
lower doses.
    (ii) Documented evidence is presented to show that the metabolite(s) 
produced only at high doses in the experimental animal species are the 
ultimate carcinogen(s) and that the metabolites produced at low doses 
are not also carcinogenic; and
    (iii) Documented evidence is presented to show that the 
metabolite(s) produced only at high doses in the experimental animal 
species are not produced in humans exposed to low doses.

    (e) Benign tumors. The Secretary will consider evidence that the 
substance subject to the rulemaking proceeding is capable only of 
inducing benign tumors in humans or experimental animals provided that 
the evidence for the specific substance meets the following criteria:

    Criteria. (i) Data are available from at least two well-conducted 
bioassays in each of two species of mammals (or from equivalent evidence 
in more than two species);
    (ii) Each of the bioassays to be considered has been conducted for 
the full lifetime of the experimental animals;
    (iii) The relevant tissue slides are made available to OSHA or its 
designee and the diagnoses of the tumors as benign are made by at least 
one qualified pathologist who has personally examined each of the slides 
and who provides specific diagnostic criteria and descriptions; and
    (iv) All of the induced tumors must be shown to belong to a type 
which is known not to progress to malignancy or to be at a benign stage 
when observed. In the latter case, data must be presented to show that 
multiple sections of the affected organ(s) were adequately examined to 
search for invasion of the tumor cells into adjacent tissue, and that 
multiple sections of other organs were adequately examined to search for 
tumor metastases.

    (f) Indirect mechanisms. The Secretary will consider evidence that 
positive results obtained in a carcinogenesis bioassay with experimental 
animals are not relevant to a determination of a carcinogenic risk to 
exposed workers, if the evidence demonstrates that the mechanism by 
which the observed tumor incidence is effected is indirect and would not 
occur if humans were exposed. As examples, evidence will be considered 
that a substance causes a carcinogenic effect by augmenting caloric 
intake or that the carcinogenic effect from exposure to a substance is 
demonstrated to be the result of the presence of a carcinogenic virus 
and it is demonstrated that, in either case, the effect would not take 
place in the absence of the particular carcinogenic virus or the 
augmented caloric intake.

[45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981]