[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 29, Volume 3]
[Revised as of July 1, 2005]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 29CFR790.7]

[Page 673-675]
 
                             TITLE 29--LABOR
 
         CHAPTER V--WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
 
PART 790_GENERAL STATEMENT AS TO THE EFFECT OF THE PORTAL-TO-PORTAL ACT 
OF 1947 ON THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 790.7  ``Preliminary'' and ``postliminary'' activities.

    (a) Since section 4 of the Portal Act applies only to situations 
where employees engage in ``preliminary'' or ``postliminary'' activities 
outside the workday proper, it is necessary to consider what activities 
fall within this description. The fact that an employee devotes some of 
his time to an activity of this type is, however, not a sufficient 
reason for disregarding the time devoted to such activity in computing 
hours worked. If such time would otherwise be counted as time worked 
under the Fair Labor Standards Act, section 4 may not change the 
situation. Whether such time must be counted or may be disregarded, and 
whether the relief from liability or punishment afforded by section 4 of 
the Portal Act is available to the employer in such a situation will 
depend on the compensability of the activity under contract, custom, or 
practice within the meaning of that section. \40\ On the other hand, the 
criteria described in the Portal Act have no bearing on the 
compensability or the status as worktime under the Fair Labor Standards 
Act of activities that are not ``preliminary'' or ``postliminary'' 
activities outside the workday. \41\ And even where there is a contract, 
custom, or practice to pay for time spent in such a ``preliminary'' or 
``postliminary'' activity, section 4(d) of the Portal Act does not make 
such time hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act, if it would 
not be so counted under the latter Act alone. \42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See Conference Report. pp. 10, 12, 13; statements of Senator 
Donnell, 93 Cong. Rec. 2178-2179, 2181, 2182; statements of Senator 
Cooper, 93 Cong. Rec. 2297, 2298. See also Sec. Sec. 790.4 and 790.5.
    \41\ See Conference Report, p. 12; Senate Report, pp. 47, 48; 
statement of Senator Wiley, explaining the conference agreement to the 
Senate, 93 Cong. Rec. 4269; statement of Representative Gwynne, 
explaining the conference agreement to the House of Representatives, 93 
Cong. Rec. 4388. See also Sec. 790.6.
    \42\ See Sec. 790.5(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) The words ``preliminary activity'' mean an activity engaged in 
by an employee before the commencement of his ``principal'' activity or 
activities, and the words ``postliminary activity'' means an activity 
engaged in by an employee after the completion of his ``principal'' 
activity or activities. No categorical list of ``preliminary'' and 
``postliminary'' activities except those named in the Act can be made, 
since activities which under one set of circumstances may be 
``preliminary'' or ``postliminary'' activities, may under other 
conditions be ``principal'' activities. The following ``preliminary'' or 
``postliminary'' activities are expressly mentioned in the Act: 
``Walking, riding, or traveling to or from the actual place of 
performance of the principal activity or activities which (the) employee 
is employed to perform.'' \43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ Portal Act, subsections 4(a), 4(d). See also Conference Report, 
p. 13; statement of Senator Donnell, 93 Cong. Rec. 2181, 2362.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) The statutory language and the legislative history indicate that 
the ``walking, riding or traveling'' to which section 4(a) refers is 
that which occurs, whether on or off the employer's premises, in the 
course of an employee's ordinary daily trips between his home or lodging 
and the actual place where he does what he is employed to do. It does 
not, however, include travel from the place of performance of one 
principal activity to the place of performance of another, nor does it 
include travel during the employee's regular working hours. \44\ For 
example, travel by a repairman from one place where he performs repair 
work to another such place, or travel by a messenger delivering 
messages, is not the kind of ``walking, riding or traveling'' described 
in section 4(a). Also, where an employee travels outside his regular 
working hours at the direction and on the business of his employer, the 
travel

[[Page 674]]

would not ordinarily be ``walking, riding, or traveling'' of the type 
referred to in section 4(a). One example would be a traveling employee 
whose duties require him to travel from town to town outside his regular 
working hours; another would be an employee who has gone home after 
completing his day's work but is subsequently called out at night to 
travel a substantial distance and perform an emergency job for one of 
his employer's customers. \45\ In situations such as these, where an 
employee's travel is not of the kind to which section 4(a) of the Portal 
Act refers, the question whether the travel time is to be counted as 
worktime under the Fair Labor Standards Act will continue to be 
determined by principles established under this Act, without reference 
to the Portal Act. \46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ These conclusions are supported by the limitation, ``to and 
from the actual place of performance of the principal activity or 
activities which (the) employee is employed to perform,'' which follows 
the term ``walking, riding or traveling'' in section 4(a), and by the 
additional limitation applicable to all ``preliminary'' and 
``postliminary'' activities to the effect that the Act may affect them 
only if they occur ``prior to'' or ``subsequent to'' the workday. See, 
in this connection the statements of Senator Donnell, 93 Conf. Rec. 
2121, 2181, 2182, 2363; statement of Senator Cooper, 93 Cong. Rec. 2297. 
See also Senate Report, pp. 47, 48.
    \45\ The report of the Senate Judiciary Committee (p. 48) emphasized 
that this section of the Act ``does not attempt to cover by specific 
language that many thousands of situations that do not readily fall 
within the pattern of the ordinary workday.''
    \46\ These principles are discussed in part 785 of this chapter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (d) An employee who walks, rides or otherwide travels while 
performing active duties is not engaged in the activities described in 
section 4(a). An illustration of such travel would be the carrying by a 
logger of a portable power saw or other heavy equipment (as 
distinguished from ordinary hand tools) on his trip into the woods to 
the cutting area. In such a situation, the walking, riding, or traveling 
is not segreable from the simultaneous performance of his assigned work 
(the carrying of the equipment, etc.) and it does not constitute travel 
``to and from the actual place of performance'' of the principal 
activities he is employed to perform. \47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ Senator Cooper, after explaining that the ``principal'' 
activities referred to include activities which are an integral part of 
a ``principal'' activity (Senate Report, pp. 47, 48), that is, those 
which ``are indispensable to the performance of the productive work,'' 
summarized this provision as it appeared in the Senate Bill by stating: 
``We have clearly eliminated from compensation walking, traveling, 
riding, and other activities which are not an integral part of the 
employment for which the worker is employer.'' 93 Cong. Rec. 2299.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (e) The report of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary (p. 47) 
describes the travel affected by the statute as ``Walking, riding, or 
traveling to and from the actual place of performance of the principal 
activity or activities within the employer's plant, mine, building, or 
other place of employment, irrespective of whether such walking, riding, 
or traveling occur on or off the premises of the employer or before or 
after the employee has checked in or out.'' The phrase, actual place of 
performance,'' as used in section 4(a), thus emphasizes that the 
ordinary travel at the beginning and end of the workday to which this 
section relates includes the employee's travel on the employer's 
premises until he reaches his workbench or other place where he 
commences the performance of the principal activity or activities, and 
the return travel from that place at the end of the workday. However 
where an employee performs his principal activity at various places 
(common examples would be a telephone lineman, a ``trouble-shooter'' in 
a manufacturing plant, a meter reader, or an exterminator) the travel 
between those places is not travel of the nature described in this 
section, and the Portal Act has not significance in determining whether 
the travel time should be counted as time worked.
    (f) Examples of walking, riding, or traveling which may be performed 
outside the workday and would normally be considered ``preliminary'' or 
``postliminary'' activities are (1) walking or riding by an employee 
between the plant gate and the employee's lathe, workbench or other 
actual place of performance of his principal activity or activities; (2) 
riding on buses between a town and an outlying mine or factory where the 
employee is employed; and (3) riding on buses or trains from a logging 
camp to a particular site at which the logging operations are actually 
being conducted. \48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See Senate Report, p. 47; statements of Senator Donnell, 93 
Cong. Rec. 2121, 2182, 3263.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (g) Other types of activities which may be performed outside the 
workday

[[Page 675]]

and, when performed under the conditions normally present, would be 
considered ``preliminary'' or ``postliminary'' activities, include 
checking in and out and waiting in line to do so, changing clothes, 
washing up or showering, and waiting in line to receive pay checks. \49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ See Senate Report p. 47. Washing up after work, like the 
changing of clothes, may in certain situations be so directly related to 
the specific work the employee is employed to perform that it would be 
regarded as an integral part of the employee's ``principal activity''. 
See colloquy between Senators Cooper and McGrath, 93 Cong. Rec. 2297-
2298. See also paragraph (h) of this section and Sec. 790.8(c). This 
does not necessarily mean, however, that travel between the washroom or 
clothes-changing place and the actual place of performance of the 
specific work the employee is employed to perform, would be excluded 
from the type of travel to which section 4(a) refers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (h) As indicated above, an activity which is a ``preliminary'' or 
``postliminary'' activity under one set of circumstances may be a 
principal activity under other conditions. \50\ This may be illustrated 
by the following example: Waiting before the time established for the 
commencement of work would be regarded as a preliminary activity when 
the employee voluntarily arrives at his place of employment earlier than 
he is either required or expected to arrive. Where, however, an employee 
is required by his employer to report at a particular hour at his 
workbench or other place where he performs his principal activity, if 
the employee is there at that hour ready and willing to work but for 
some reason beyond his control there is no work for him to perform until 
some time has elapsed, waiting for work would be an integral part of the 
employee's principal activities. \51\ The difference in the two 
situations is that in the second the employee was engaged to wait while 
in the first the employee waited to be engaged. \52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See paragraph (b) of this section. See also footnote 49.
    \51\ Colloquy between Senators Cooper and McGrath, 93 Cong. Rec. 
2298.
    \52\ See Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 7 WHR 1165.

[12 FR 7655, Nov. 18, 1947, as amended at 35 FR 7383, May 12, 1970]