[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 47, Volume 3]
[Revised as of October 1, 2005]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 47CFR51.311]

[Page 31]
 
                       TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION
 
        CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED)
 
PART 51_INTERCONNECTION--Table of Contents
 
  Subpart D_Additional Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers
 
Sec. 51.311  Nondiscriminatory access to unbundled network elements.

    (a) The quality of an unbundled network element, as well as the 
quality of the access to the unbundled network element, that an 
incumbent LEC provides to a requesting telecommunications carrier shall 
be the same for all telecommunications carriers requesting access to 
that network element.
    (b) To the extent technically feasible, the quality of an unbundled 
network element, as well as the quality of the access to such unbundled 
network element, that an incumbent LEC provides to a requesting 
telecommunications carrier shall be at least equal in quality to that 
which the incumbent LEC provides to itself. If an incumbent LEC fails to 
meet this requirement, the incumbent LEC must prove to the state 
commission that it is not technically feasible to provide the requested 
unbundled network element, or to provide access to the requested 
unbundled network element, at a level of quality that is equal to that 
which the incumbent LEC provides to itself.
    (c) Previous successful access to an unbundled element at a 
particular point in a network, using particular facilities, is 
substantial evidence that access is technically feasible at that point, 
or at substantially similar points, in networks employing substantially 
similar facilities. Adherence to the same interface or protocol 
standards shall constitute evidence of the substantial similarity of 
network facilities.
    (d) Previous successful provision of access to an unbundled element 
at a particular point in a network at a particular level of quality is 
substantial evidence that access is technically feasible at that point, 
or at substantially similar points, at that level of quality.

[61 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 52294, Sept. 2, 2003]