[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 48, Volume 6] [Revised as of October 1, 2005] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 48CFR1536.602-2] [Page 52-53] TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM CHAPTER 15--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PART 1536_CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS--Table of Contents Subpart 1536.6_Architect-Engineer Services Sec. 1536.602-2 Establishment of evaluation boards. (a) The Environmental Protection Agency Architect-Engineer Evaluation Board is established as a central permanent Board located at Headquarters EPA under authority delegated to the Director, Office of Acquisition Management. The Board shall perform all architect-engineer evaluations on an agency-wide basis. The Agency Board shall be composed of not less than three nor more than five voting members and one non- voting advisory member from the contracting office. The following constitutes the minimum composition of the Architect-Engineer Evaluation Board: (1) Member and Chairperson. Chief, Engineering, Planning, and Architecture Branch, Facilities Management and Services Division or his/ her designee; (2) Member. A professional engineer or architect from EPA to be designated by the Chairperson; (3) Member. A program official initiating the requirement or a designated representative; and (4) Advisory Member. A Contracting Officer or his/her representative. (b) The Service Center Manager (SCM) is delegated the authority to appoint either one or two additional voting members as may be appropriate for a particular project. (c) In the event of an emergency or extended absence, a member may designate, in writing, with the concurrence of the Chairperson, an alternate experienced in architecture, engineering, or construction to serve in his/her absence. (d) The duties of the advisory member shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Assuring that the criteria set forth in the public notice are applied in the evaluation process; and [[Page 53]] (2) Assuring that actions taken during the evaluation process do not compromise subsequent procurement actions. [59 FR 18977, Apr. 21, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 5052, Feb. 4, 2002]