[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 48, Volume 1]

[Revised as of October 1, 2005]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 48CFR31.201-6]



[Page 601-602]

 

            TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

 

                CHAPTER 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION

 

PART 31_CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES--Table of Contents

 

          Subpart 31.2_Contracts With Commercial Organizations

 

Sec. 31.201-6  Accounting for unallowable costs.



    (a) Costs that are expressly unallowable or mutually agreed to be 

unallowable, including mutually agreed to be unallowable directly 

associated costs, shall be identified and excluded from any billing, 

claim, or proposal applicable to a Government contract. A directly 

associated cost is any cost which is generated solely as a result of 

incurring another cost, and which would not have been incurred had the 

other cost not been incurred. When an unallowable cost is incurred, its 

directly associated costs are also unallowable.

    (b) Costs which specifically become designated as unallowable or as 

unallowable directly associated costs of unallowable costs as a result 

of a written decision furnished by a contracting officer shall be 

identified if included in or used in computing any billing, claim, or 

proposal applicable to a Government contract. This identification 

requirement applies also to any costs incurred for the same purpose 

under like circumstances as the costs specifically identified as 

unallowable under either this paragraph or paragraph (a) above.

    (c) The practices for accounting for and presentation of unallowable 

costs will be those as described in 48 CFR 9904.405-50, Accounting for 

Unallowable Costs.

    (d) If a directly associated cost is included in a cost pool which 

is allocated over a base that includes the unallowable cost with which 

it is associated, the directly associated cost shall remain in the cost 

pool. Since the unallowable costs will attract their allocable share of 

costs from the cost pool, no further action is required to assure 

disallowance of the directly associated costs. In all other cases, the 

directly associated costs, if material in amount, must be purged from 

the cost pool as unallowable costs.

    (e)(1) In determining the materiality of a directly associated cost, 

consideration should be given to the significance of (i) the actual 

dollar amount, (ii) the cumulative effect of all directly associated 

costs in a cost pool, or (iii) the ultimate effect on the cost of 

Government contracts.



[[Page 602]]



    (2) Salary expenses of employees who participate in activities that 

generate unallowable costs shall be treated as directly associated costs 

to the extent of the time spent on the proscribed activity, provided the 

costs are material in accordance with subparagraph (e)(1) above (except 

when such salary expenses are, themselves, unallowable). The time spent 

in proscribed activities should be compared to total time spent on 

company activities to determine if the costs are material. Time spent by 

employees outside the normal working hours should not be considered 

except when it is evident that an employee engages so frequently in 

company activities during periods outside normal working hours as to 

indicate that such activities are a part of the employee's regular 

duties.

    (3) When a selected item of cost under 31.205 provides that directly 

associated costs be unallowable, it is intended that such directly 

associated costs be unallowable only if determined to be material in 

amount in accordance with the criteria provided in paragraphs (e)(1) and 

(e)(2) above, except in those situations where allowance of any of the 

directly associated costs involved would be considered to be contrary to 

public policy.



[48 FR 42301, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 67045, Dec. 28, 1994]



    Effective Date Note: At 70 FR 57466, Sept. 30, 2005, Sec. 31.201-6 

was amended by removing from the second sentence of paragraph (a) and 

the first sentence of paragraph (b) the word ``which'' each time it 

appears (3 times) and adding the word ``that'' in its place; revising 

paragraph (c); removing from the first sentence of paragraph (d) the 

word ``which'' the first time it appears and adding ``that'' in its 

place; and by removing from the end of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) the word 

``or'' and adding the word ``and'' in its place; and revising paragraph 

(e)(3), effective Oct. 31, 2005. For the convenience of the user, the 

revised text is set forth as follows:



31.201-6   Accounting for unallowable costs.



                                * * * * *



    (c)(1) The practices for accounting for and presentation of 

unallowable costs must be those described in 48 CFR 9904.405, Accounting 

for Unallowable Costs.

    (2) Statistical sampling is an acceptable practice for contractors 

to follow in accounting for and presenting unallowable costs provided 

the criteria in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), and (c)(1)(iii) of 

this subsection are met:

    (i) The statistical sampling results in an unbiased sample that is a 

reasonable representation of the sampling universe.

    (ii) Any large dollar value or high risk transaction is separately 

reviewed for unallowable costs and excluded from the sampling process.

    (iii) The statistical sampling permits audit verification.

    (3) For any indirect cost in the selected sample that is subject to 

the penalty provisions at 42.709, the amount projected to the sampling 

universe from that sampled cost is also subject to the same penalty 

provisions.

    (4) Use of statistical sampling methods for identifying and 

segregating unallowable costs should be the subject of an advance 

agreement under the provisions of 31.109 between the contractor and the 

cognizant administrative contracting officer or Federal official. The 

advance agreement should specify the basic characteristics of the 

sampling process. The cognizant administrative contracting officer or 

Federal official shall request input from the cognizant auditor before 

entering into any such agreements.

    (5) In the absence of an advance agreement, if an initial review of 

the facts results in a challenge of the statistical sampling methods by 

the contracting officer or the contracting officer's representative, the 

burden of proof shall be on the contractor to establish that such a 

method meets the criteria in paragraph (c)(2) of this subsection.



                                * * * * *



    (e)(1) * * *

    (3) When a selected item of cost under 31.205 provides that directly 

associated costs be unallowable, such directly associated costs are 

unallowable only if determined to be material in amount in accordance 

with the criteria provided in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this 

subsection, except in those situations where allowance of any of the 

directly associated costs involved would be considered to be contrary to 

public policy.