[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 48, Volume 1]

[Revised as of October 1, 2005]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 48CFR7.306]



[Page 118-120]

 

            TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

 

                CHAPTER 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION

 

PART 7_ACQUISITION PLANNING--Table of Contents

 

          Subpart 7.3_Contractor Versus Government Performance

 

Sec. 7.306  Evaluation.



    The evaluation procedure to be followed after the contracting 

officer receives the cost estimate for Government performance (see 

7.304(b)) and the responses to the solicitation differs from 

conventional contracting procedures as follows:

    (a) Sealed bidding. (1) At the public bid opening, after recording 

of bids, the contracting officer shall--

    (i) Open the sealed cost comparison on which the cost estimate for 

Government performance has been entered;

    (ii) Enter on the cost comparison form the price of the apparent low 

bidder;



[[Page 119]]



    (iii) Announce the result, based on the initial cost comparison 

form, stating that this result is subject to required agency processing, 

including evaluation for responsiveness and responsibility, completion 

and audit of the cost comparison form (see Supplement, Part IV, 

Illustration 1), and resolution of any requests for review under the 

appeals procedure (see 7.307);

    (iv) State that no final determination for performance by the 

Government or under contract will be made during the public review 

period specified in the solicitation (at least 15 working days, up to a 

maximum of 30 working days if the contracting officer considers the 

action to be complex; the public review period begins when the documents 

identified in (v) below are available to interested parties), plus any 

additional time required for the appeals procedure; and

    (v) Make available for this public review by interested parties the 

abstract of bids, completed cost comparison form, and detailed data 

supporting the cost estimate for Government performance.

    (2) After evaluation of bids (see subpart 14.4) and determinations 

of responsibility, the contracting officer shall provide the price of 

the low responsive, responsible bidder to the preparer of the cost 

estimate for Government performance, for final Government review of the 

cost comparison form.

    (3) Upon completion of the review process, including resolution of 

any request under 7.307, the responsible agency official shall make the 

final determination for performance by the Government or under contract 

and provide written notification to the contracting officer, who shall 

either award a contract or cancel the solicitation as required.

    (4) The contracting officer shall make the completed and approved 

cost comparison analysis available to interested parties upon request.

    (b) Negotiation. The contracting officer shall receive proposals, 

evaluate them (see subpart 15.3), conduct negotiations, and select the 

most advantageous proposal in accordance with normal contracting 

procedures (see part 15). The contracting officer shall, before public 

announcement, open the sealed estimate in the presence of the preparer, 

enter the amount of the most advantageous proposal on the cost 

comparison form, and return the form to the preparer of the cost 

estimate for Government performance for completion. The preparer shall 

give due consideration to all types of costs which could add or subtract 

from the cost of either mode of performance.

    (1) If the result of the cost comparison favors performance under 

contract and the responsible agency official approves the result, the 

contracting officer shall award a contract in accordance with agency 

procedures. Concurrently with the award, the contracting officer shall 

publicly--

    (i) Notify interested parties of the result of the cost comparison;

    (ii) Inform interested parties that the completed cost comparison 

form and detailed supporting data are available for review;

    (iii) Announce the contractor's name; and

    (iv) Advise interested parties that contractor preparations for 

performance are conditioned upon completion of the public review period 

specified in the solicitation plus any additional period required by the 

appeals procedure.

    (2) If the result of the cost comparison favors Government 

performance, the contracting officer shall--

    (i) Notify interested parties of the result of the cost comparison;

    (ii) Inform interested parties that the completed cost comparison 

form and detailed supporting data relative to the Government cost 

estimate are available for public review (see subparagraph (3) below); 

and

    (iii) Announce the price of the offer most advantageous to the 

Government.

    (3) The public review period shall begin with the contracting 

officer's announcement of the cost comparison result and availability of 

the cost comparison forms and detailed supporting data to interested 

parties. The review period shall last for the period specified in the 

solicitation (at least 15 working days, up to a maximum of 30 working 

days if the contracting officer considers the action to be complex). 

Upon completion of the public review period and resolution of any 

questions raised under 7.307, the responsible



[[Page 120]]



agency official shall provide the contracting officer written 

notification of the final cost comparison decision. The contracting 

officer shall then, in the case of subparagraph (b)(1) of this section, 

give the contractor notice to commence or cancel the contract as 

appropriate or, in the case of subparagraph (b)(2) of this section, 

cancel the solicitation or award the contract, as appropriate.



[48 FR 42124, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1735, Jan. 11, 1985; 

50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 51 FR 34125, Sept. 3, 1986; 53 FR 661, Jan. 

11, 1988; 55 FR 25526, June 21, 1990; 56 FR 41744, Aug. 22, 1991; 57 FR 

60575, Dec. 21, 1992; 60 FR 34737, July 3, 1995; 62 FR 51270, Sept. 30, 

1997]