[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 48, Volume 1]

[Revised as of October 1, 2005]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 48CFR8.405-6]



[Page 132-133]

 

            TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

 

                CHAPTER 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION

 

PART 8_REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES--Table of Contents

 

                  Subpart 8.4_Federal Supply Schedules

 

Sec. 8.405-6  Limited sources justification and approval.



    (a) Orders placed under Federal Supply Schedules are exempt from the 

requirements in Part 6. However, an ordering activity must justify its 

action when restricting consideration of schedule contractors to fewer 

than required in 8.405-1 or 8.405-2.

    (b) Circumstances that may justify restriction include--

    (1) Only one source is capable of responding due to the unique or 

specialized nature of the work;

    (2) The new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal 

Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in 

accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering 

procedures. The original order must not have been previously issued 

under sole source or limited source procedures;

    (3) The item is peculiar to one manufacturer. A brand name item, 

whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar 

to one manufacturer; or

    (4) An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the ordering 

procedures would result in unacceptable delays.

    (c) When an ordering activity restricts consideration of schedule 

contractors to fewer than that required in 8.405-1 or 8.405-2, the 

ordering activity shall procure such requirements under this subpart 

only if the need to do so is justified in writing and approved at the 

levels specified in paragraphs (d) and (f) of this subsection.

    (d) Orders exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, but not exceeding 

the simplified acquisition threshold as defined in 2.101. For proposed 

orders exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, but not exceeding the 

simplified acquisition threshold, the ordering activity contracting 

officer shall document the circumstances when restricting consideration 

of schedule contractors to fewer than required in 8.405-1 or 8.405-2.

    (e) Orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. (1) For 

proposed orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the 

requiring activity shall assist the ordering activity contracting 

officer in the preparation of the justification. The justification shall 

cite that the acquisition is conducted under the authority of the 

Multiple Award Schedule Program (see 8.401).

    (2) As a minimum, each justification shall include the following 

information:

    (i) Identification of the agency and the contracting activity, and 

specific identification of the document as a ``Limited Source 

Justification.''

    (ii) Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

    (iii) A description of the supplies or services required to meet the 

agency's needs (including the estimated value).

    (iv) Identification of the justification rationale (see 8.405-6(b)) 

and, if applicable, a demonstration of the proposed contractor's unique 

qualifications to provide the required supply or service.

    (v) A determination by the ordering activity contracting officer 

that the order represents the best value consistent with 8.404(d).

    (vi) A description of the market research conducted among schedule 

holders and the results or a statement of the reason market research was 

not conducted.

    (vii) Any other facts supporting the justification.

    (viii) A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to 

remove or overcome any barriers that preclude the agency from meeting 

the requirements of 8.405-1 and 8.405-2 before any subsequent 

acquisition for the supplies or services is made.

    (ix) The ordering activity contracting officer's certification that 

the justification is accurate and complete to the best of the 

contracting officer's knowledge and belief.

    (x) Evidence that any supporting data that is the responsibility of 

technical or requirements personnel (e.g., verifying the Government's 

minimum



[[Page 133]]



needs or requirements or other rationale for limited sources) and which 

form a basis for the justification have been certified as complete and 

accurate by the technical or requirements personnel.

    (f) Justification approvals. (1) For proposed orders exceeding the 

simplified acquisition threshold, but not exceeding $500,000, the 

ordering activity contracting officer's certification that the 

justification is accurate and complete to the best of the ordering 

activity contracting officer's knowledge and belief will serve as 

approval, unless a higher approval level is established in accordance 

with agency procedures.

    (2) For a proposed order exceeding $500,000, but not exceeding $10 

million, the justification must be approved by the competition advocate 

of the activity placing the order, or by an official named in paragraph 

(f)(3) or (f)(4) of this subsection. This authority is not delegable.

    (3) For a proposed order exceeding $10 million, but not exceeding 

$50 million (or, for DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, not exceeding $75 

million), the justification must be approved by--

    (i) The head of the procuring activity placing the order;

    (ii) A designee who--

    (A) If a member of the armed forces, is a general or flag officer;

    (B) If a civilian, is serving in a position in a grade above GS-15 

under the General Schedule (or in a comparable or higher position under 

another schedule); or

    (iii) An official named in paragraph (f)(4) of this subsection.

    (4) For a proposed order exceeding $50 million (or, for DoD, NASA, 

and the Coast Guard, over $75 million), the justification must be 

approved by the senior procurement executive of the agency placing the 

order. This authority is not delegable, except in the case of the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, acting 

as the senior procurement executive for the Department of Defense.



[69 FR 34234, June 18, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 43579, July 27, 2005]