[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 48, Volume 7]

[Revised as of October 1, 2005]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 48CFR9903.201-6]



[Page 276-277]

 

            TITLE 48--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

 

     CHAPTER 99--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, OFFICE OF FEDERAL 

           PROCUREMENT POLICY, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

 

PART 9903_CONTRACT COVERAGE--Table of Contents

 

                 Subpart 9903.2_CAS Program Requirements

 

Sec. 9903.201-6  Findings.



    (a) Required change--(1) Finding. Prior to making any equitable 

adjustment under the provisions of paragraph (a)(4)(i) of the contract 

clause set forth in 9903.201-4(a) or 9903.201-4(e), or paragraph 

(a)(3)(i) of the contract clause set forth in 9903.201-4(c), the 

Contracting Officer shall make a finding that the practice change was 

required to comply with a CAS, modification or interpretation thereof, 

that subsequently became applicable to the contract; or, for planned 

changes being made in order to remain CAS compliant, that the former 

practice was in compliance with applicable CAS and the planned change is 

necessary for the contractor to remain in compliance.

    (2) Required change means a change in cost accounting practice that 

a contractor is required to make in order to comply with applicable 

Standards, modifications, or interpretations thereto, that subsequently 

become applicable to an existing CAS-covered contract due to the receipt 

of another CAS-covered contract or subcontract. It also includes a 

prospective change to a disclosed or established cost accounting 

practice when the cognizant Federal agency official determines that the 

former practice was in compliance with applicable CAS and the change is 

necessary for the contractor to remain in compliance.

    (b) Unilateral change--(1) Findings. Prior to making any contract 

price or cost adjustment(s) under the change provisions of paragraph 

(a)(4)(ii) of the contract clause set forth in 9903.201-4(a) or 

9903.201-4(e), or paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of the contract clause set forth 

in 9903.201-4(c), the Contracting Officer shall make a finding that the 

contemplated contract price and cost adjustments will protect the United 

States from payment of increased costs, in the aggregate; and that the 

net effect of the adjustments being made does not result in the recovery 

of more than the estimated amount of such increased costs.

    (2) Unilateral change by a contractor means a change in cost 

accounting practice from one compliant practice to another compliant 

practice that a contractor with a CAS-covered contract(s) elects to make 

that has not been deemed desirable by the cognizant Federal agency 

official and for which the Government will pay no aggregate increased 

costs.

    (3) Action to preclude the payment of aggregate increased costs by 

the Government. In the absence of a finding pursuant to paragraph (c) of 

this subsection that a compliant change is desirable, no agreement may 

be made with regard to a change to a cost accounting practice that will 

result in the payment of aggregate increased costs by the United States. 

For these changes, the cognizant Federal agency official shall limit 

upward contract price adjustments to affected contracts to the amount of 

downward contract price adjustments of other affected contracts, i.e., 

no net upward contract price adjustment shall be permitted.

    (c) Desirable change--(1) Finding. Prior to making any equitable 

adjustment under the provisions of paragraph (a)(4)(iii) of the contract 

clause set forth in 9903.201-4(a) or 9903.201-4(e), or paragraph 

(a)(3)(ii) of the contract clause set forth in 9903.201-4(c), the 

cognizant Federal agency official shall make a finding that the change 

to a cost accounting practice is desirable and not detrimental to the 

interests of the Government.

    (2) Desirable change means a compliant change to a contractor's 

established or disclosed cost accounting practices that the cognizant 

Federal agency official finds is desirable and not detrimental to the 

Government and is therefore not subject to the no increased cost 

prohibition provisions of CAS-covered contracts affected by the



[[Page 277]]



change. The cognizant Federal agency official's finding need not be 

based solely on the cost impact that a proposed practice change will 

have on a contractor's or subcontractor's current CAS-covered contracts. 

The change to a cost accounting practice may be determined to be 

desirable even though existing contract prices and/or cost allowances 

may increase. The determination that the change to a cost accounting 

practice is desirable, should be made on a case-by-case basis.

    (3) Once a determination has been made that a compliant change to a 

cost accounting practice is a desirable change, associated management 

actions that also have an impact on contract costs should be considered 

when negotiating contract price or cost adjustments that may be needed 

to equitably resolve the overall cost impact of the aggregated actions.

    (4) Until the cognizant Federal agency official has determined that 

a change to a cost accounting practice is deemed to be a desirable 

change, the change shall be considered to be a change for which the 

Government will not pay increased costs, in the aggregate.

    (d) Noncompliant cost accounting practices--(1) Findings. Prior to 

making any contract price or cost adjustment(s) under the provisions of 

paragraph (a)(5) of the contract clause set forth in 9903.201-4(a) or 

9903.201-4(e), or paragraph (a)(4) of the contract clause set forth in 

9903.201-4(c), the Contracting Officer shall make a finding that the 

contemplated contract price and cost adjustments will protect the United 

States from payment of increased costs, in the aggregate; and that the 

net effect of the adjustments being made does not result in the recovery 

of more than the estimated amount of such increased costs. While 

individual contract prices, including cost ceilings or target costs, as 

applicable, may be increased as well as decreased to resolve an 

estimating noncompliance, the aggregate value of all contracts affected 

by the estimating noncompliance shall not be increased.



[65 FR 37571, June 14, 2000]