[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 24, Volume 4]

[Revised as of April 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 24CFR902.68]



[Page 279-281]

 

                 TITLE 24--HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

 

CHAPTER IX--OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING, 

               DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

 

PART 902_PUBLIC HOUSING ASSESSMENT SYSTEM--Table of Contents

 

                         Subpart F_PHAS Scoring

 

Sec.  902.68  Technical review of results of PHAS Indicators #1 or #4.



    (a) Request for technical reviews. This section describes the 

process for requesting and granting technical reviews of physical 

inspection results and resident survey results.

    (1) For both reviews, the burden of proof is on the PHA to show that 

an error occurred.

    (2) For both reviews, a request for technical review must be 

submitted in writing to the Director of the Real Estate Assessment 

Center and must be received by REAC no later than 15 days following the 

issuance of the applicable results to the PHA (either the physical 

inspection results or the resident survey results). The request must be 

accompanied by the PHA's reasonable evidence that an error occurred.

    (b) Technical review of physical inspection results. (1) For each 

property inspected, REAC will provide the results of the physical 

inspection and a score for that property to the PHA. If the PHA believes 

that an objectively verifiable and material error (or errors)



[[Page 280]]



occurred in the inspection of an individual property, the PHA may 

request a technical review of the inspection results for that property.

    (2) For a technical review of physical inspection results, the PHA's 

request must be accompanied by the PHA's evidence that an objectively 

verifiable and material error has occurred. The documentation submitted 

by the PHA may be photographic evidence, written material from an 

objective source, such as a local fire marshal or building code 

official, or other similar evidence. The evidence must be more than a 

disagreement with the inspector's observations, or the inspector's 

finding regarding the severity of the deficiency.

    (3) A technical review of a property's physical inspection will not 

be conducted based on conditions that were corrected subsequent to the 

inspection, nor will REAC consider a request for a technical review that 

is based on a challenge to the inspector's findings as to the severity 

of the deficiency (i.e., minor, major or severe).

    (4) Upon receipt of a PHA's request for technical review of a 

property's inspection results, REAC will review the PHA's file and any 

objectively verifiable evidence produced by the PHA. If REAC's review 

determines that an objectively verifiable and material error (or errors) 

has been documented, then REAC may take one or a combination of the 

following actions:

    (i) Undertake a new inspection;

    (ii) Correct the physical inspection report;

    (iii) Issue a corrected physical condition score;

    (iv) Issue a corrected PHAS score.

    (5) In determining whether a new inspection of the property is 

warranted and a new PHAS score must be issued, REAC will review the 

PHA's file and evidence submitted to determine whether the evidence 

supports that there may have been a significant contractor error in the 

inspection which results in a significant change from the property's 

original physical condition score and the PHAS designation assigned to 

the PHA (i.e., high performer, standard performer, or troubled 

performer). If REAC determines that a new inspection is warranted, and 

the new inspection results in a significant change from the original 

physical condition score, and the PHA's PHAS score and PHAS designation, 

REAC shall issue a new PHAS score to the PHA.

    (6) Material errors are the only grounds for technical review of 

physical inspection results. Material errors are those that exhibit 

specific characteristics and meet specific thresholds. The three types 

of material errors are:

    (i) Building data error. A building data error occurs if the 

inspection includes the wrong building or a building that was not owned 

by the PHA, including common or site areas that were not a part of the 

property. Incorrect building data that does not affect the score, such 

as the address, building name, year built, etc., would not be considered 

material, but is of great interest to HUD and will be corrected upon 

notice to REAC.

    (ii) Unit count error. A unit count error occurs if the total number 

of public housing units considered in scoring is incorrect. Since 

scoring uses total public housing units, REAC will examine instances 

where the participant can provide evidence that the total units used is 

incorrect.

    (iii) Non-existent deficiency error. A non-existent deficiency error 

occurs if the inspection cites a deficiency that does not exist.

    (7) A PHA's subsequent correction of deficiencies identified as a 

result of a property's physical inspection cannot serve as the basis for 

an appeal of the PHA's physical condition score.

    (c) Technical review of resident survey results. REAC will consider 

conducting a technical review of a PHA's resident survey results in 

cases where the contracted third party organization can be shown by the 

PHA to be in error.

    (1) The burden of proof rests with the PHA to provide objectively 

verifiable evidence that a technical error occurred. Examples include, 

but are not limited to, incorrect material being mailed to residents; or 

the PHA's units addresses were incorrect due to the third party 

organization's error, such as unit numbers being omitted from the 

addresses. A PHA that does not update its unit address list as 

described,



[[Page 281]]



above, will not be eligible for a technical review based on incorrect 

addresses.

    (2) Upon receipt of a PHA's request for technical review of resident 

survey results, REAC will review the PHA's file and evidence submitted 

by the PHA. If REAC's review determines that an error has been 

documented, REAC may take one or a combination of the following actions:

    (i) Undertake a new survey;

    (ii) Correct the resident survey results report;

    (iii) Issue a corrected resident services and satisfaction score;

    (iv) Issue a corrected PHAS score.