[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 24, Volume 4]

[Revised as of April 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 24CFR983.57]



[Page 661-663]

 

                 TITLE 24--HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

 

CHAPTER IX--OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING, 

               DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

 

PART 983_PROJECT-BASED VOUCHER (PBV) PROGRAM--Table of Contents

 

               Subpart B_Selection of PBV Owner Proposals

 

Sec.  983.57  Site selection standards.



    (a) Applicability. The site selection requirements in paragraph (d) 

of this section apply only to site selection for existing housing and 

rehabilitated PBV housing. The site selection requirements in paragraph 

(e) of this section apply only to site selection for newly constructed 

PBV housing. Other provisions of this section apply to selection of a 

site for any form of PBV housing, including existing housing, newly 

constructed housing, and rehabilitated housing.

    (b) Compliance with PBV goals, civil rights requirements, and HQS. 

The PHA may not select a proposal for existing, newly constructed, or 

rehabilitated PBV housing on a site or enter into an Agreement or HAP 

contract for units on the site, unless the PHA has determined that:

    (1) Project-based assistance for housing at the selected site is 

consistent with the goal of deconcentrating poverty and expanding 

housing and economic opportunities. The standard for deconcentrating 

poverty and expanding housing and economic opportunities must be 

consistent with the PHA Plan under 24 CFR part 903 and the PHA 

Administrative Plan. In developing the standards to apply in determining 

whether a proposed PBV development will be selected, a PHA must consider 

the following:

    (i) Whether the census tract in which the proposed PBV development 

will be located is in a HUD-designated Enterprise Zone, Economic 

Community, or Renewal Community;

    (ii) Whether a PBV development will be located in a census tract 

where the concentration of assisted units will be or has decreased as a 

result of public housing demolition;

    (iii) Whether the census tract in which the proposed PBV development 

will be located is undergoing significant revitalization;

    (iv) Whether state, local, or federal dollars have been invested in 

the area that has assisted in the achievement of the statutory 

requirement;

    (v) Whether new market rate units are being developed in the same 

census tract where the proposed PBV development will be located and the 

likelihood that such market rate units will positively impact the 

poverty rate in the area;

    (vi) If the poverty rate in the area where the proposed PBV 

development will be located is greater than 20 percent, the PHA should 

consider whether in the past five years there has been an overall 

decline in the poverty rate;

    (vii) Whether there are meaningful opportunities for educational and 

economic advancement in the census tract where the proposed PBV 

development will be located.

    (2) The site is suitable from the standpoint of facilitating and 

furthering full compliance with the applicable provisions of Title VI of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-2000d(4)) and HUD's 

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 1; Title VIII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601-3629); and HUD's implementing



[[Page 662]]



regulations at 24 CFR parts 100 through 199; Executive Order 11063 (27 

FR 11527; 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 652) and HUD's implementing 

regulations at 24 CFR part 107. The site must meet the section 504 site 

selection requirements described in 24 CFR 8.4(b)(5).

    (3) The site meets the HQS site standards at 24 CFR 982.401(l).

    (c) PHA PBV site selection policy. (1) The PHA administrative plan 

must establish the PHA's policy for selection of PBV sites in accordance 

with this section.

    (2) The site selection policy must explain how the PHA's site 

selection procedures promote the PBV goals.

    (3) The PHA must select PBV sites in accordance with the PHA's site 

selection policy in the PHA administrative plan.

    (d) Existing and rehabilitated housing site and neighborhood 

standards. A site for existing or rehabilitated housing must meet the 

following site and neighborhood standards. The site must:

    (1) Be adequate in size, exposure, and contour to accommodate the 

number and type of units proposed, and adequate utilities and streets 

must be available to service the site. (The existence of a private 

disposal system and private sanitary water supply for the site, approved 

in accordance with law, may be considered adequate utilities.)

    (2) Promote greater choice of housing opportunities and avoid undue 

concentration of assisted persons in areas containing a high proportion 

of low-income persons.

    (3) Be accessible to social, recreational, educational, commercial, 

and health facilities and services and other municipal facilities and 

services that are at least equivalent to those typically found in 

neighborhoods consisting largely of unassisted, standard housing of 

similar market rents.

    (4) Be so located that travel time and cost via public 

transportation or private automobile from the neighborhood to places of 

employment providing a range of jobs for lower-income workers is not 

excessive. While it is important that housing for the elderly not be 

totally isolated from employment opportunities, this requirement need 

not be adhered to rigidly for such projects.

    (e) New construction site and neighborhood standards. A site for 

newly constructed housing must meet the following site and neighborhood 

standards:

    (1) The site must be adequate in size, exposure, and contour to 

accommodate the number and type of units proposed, and adequate 

utilities (water, sewer, gas, and electricity) and streets must be 

available to service the site.

    (2) The site must not be located in an area of minority 

concentration, except as permitted under paragraph (e)(3) of this 

section, and must not be located in a racially mixed area if the project 

will cause a significant increase in the proportion of minority to non-

minority residents in the area.

    (3) A project may be located in an area of minority concentration 

only if:

    (i) Sufficient, comparable opportunities exist for housing for 

minority families in the income range to be served by the proposed 

project outside areas of minority concentration (see paragraph 

(e)(3)(iii), (iv), and (v) of this section for further guidance on this 

criterion); or

    (ii) The project is necessary to meet overriding housing needs that 

cannot be met in that housing market area (see paragraph (e) (3)(vi)) of 

this section for further guidance on this criterion).

    (iii) As used in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section, ``sufficient'' 

does not require that in every locality there be an equal number of 

assisted units within and outside of areas of minority concentration. 

Rather, application of this standard should produce a reasonable 

distribution of assisted units each year, that, over a period of several 

years, will approach an appropriate balance of housing choices within 

and outside areas of minority concentration. An appropriate balance in 

any jurisdiction must be determined in light of local conditions 

affecting the range of housing choices available for low-income minority 

families and in relation to the racial mix of the locality's population.

    (iv) Units may be considered ``comparable opportunities,'' as used 

in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section, if they



[[Page 663]]



have the same household type (elderly, disabled, family, large family) 

and tenure type (owner/renter); require approximately the same tenant 

contribution towards rent; serve the same income group; are located in 

the same housing market; and are in standard condition.

    (v) Application of this sufficient, comparable opportunities 

standard involves assessing the overall impact of HUD-assisted housing 

on the availability of housing choices for low-income minority families 

in and outside areas of minority concentration, and must take into 

account the extent to which the following factors are present, along 

with other factors relevant to housing choice:

    (A) A significant number of assisted housing units are available 

outside areas of minority concentration.

    (B) There is significant integration of assisted housing projects 

constructed or rehabilitated in the past 10 years, relative to the 

racial mix of the eligible population.

    (C) There are racially integrated neighborhoods in the locality.

    (D) Programs are operated by the locality to assist minority 

families that wish to find housing outside areas of minority 

concentration.

    (E) Minority families have benefited from local activities (e.g., 

acquisition and write-down of sites, tax relief programs for homeowners, 

acquisitions of units for use as assisted housing units) undertaken to 

expand choice for minority families outside of areas of minority 

concentration.

    (F) A significant proportion of minority households has been 

successful in finding units in non-minority areas under the tenant-based 

assistance programs.

    (G) Comparable housing opportunities have been made available 

outside areas of minority concentration through other programs.

    (vi) Application of the ``overriding housing needs'' criterion, for 

example, permits approval of sites that are an integral part of an 

overall local strategy for the preservation or restoration of the 

immediate neighborhood and of sites in a neighborhood experiencing 

significant private investment that is demonstrably improving the 

economic character of the area (a ``revitalizing area''). An 

``overriding housing need,'' however, may not serve as the basis for 

determining that a site is acceptable, if the only reason the need 

cannot otherwise be feasibly met is that discrimination on the basis of 

race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, familial status, or 

disability renders sites outside areas of minority concentration 

unavailable or if the use of this standard in recent years has had the 

effect of circumventing the obligation to provide housing choice.

    (4) The site must promote greater choice of housing opportunities 

and avoid undue concentration of assisted persons in areas containing a 

high proportion of low-income persons.

    (5) The neighborhood must not be one that is seriously detrimental 

to family life or in which substandard dwellings or other undesirable 

conditions predominate, unless there is actively in progress a concerted 

program to remedy the undesirable conditions.

    (6) The housing must be accessible to social, recreational, 

educational, commercial, and health facilities and services and other 

municipal facilities and services that are at least equivalent to those 

typically found in neighborhoods consisting largely of unassisted, 

standard housing of similar market rents.

    (7) Except for new construction, housing designed for elderly 

persons, travel time, and cost via public transportation or private 

automobile from the neighborhood to places of employment providing a 

range of jobs for lower-income workers, must not be excessive.