[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 15, Volume 3]

[Revised as of January 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 15CFR904.108]



[Page 44-45]

 

                  TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND FOREIGN TRADE

 

CHAPTER IX--NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT 

                               OF COMMERCE

 

PART 904_CIVIL PROCEDURES--Table of Contents

 

                        Subpart B_Civil Penalties

 

Sec. 904.108  Factors considered in assessing penalties.



    (a) Factors to be taken into account in assessing a penalty, 

depending upon the statute in question, may include the nature, 

circumstances, extent, and gravity of the alleged violation; the 

respondent's degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, and 

ability to pay; and such other matters as justice may require. NOAA will 

take into account a respondent's ability to pay when assessing a civil 

penalty for a violation of any of the statutes NOAA administers.

    (b) NOAA may, in consideration of a respondent's ability to pay, 

increase or decrease a penalty from an amount that would otherwise be 

warranted by the other relevant factors. A penalty may be increased if a 

respondent's ability to pay is such that a higher penalty is necessary 

to deter future violations, or for commercial violators, to make a 

penalty more than a cost of doing business. A penalty may be decreased 

if the respondent establishes that he or she is unable to pay an 

otherwise appropriate penalty amount.

    (c) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, if a 

respondent asserts that a penalty should be reduced because of an 

inability to pay, the respondent has the burden of proving



[[Page 45]]



such inability by providing verifiable, complete, and accurate financial 

information to NOAA. NOAA will not consider a respondent's inability to 

pay unless the respondent, upon request, submits such financial 

information as Agency counsel determines is adequate to evaluate the 

respondent's financial condition. Depending on the circumstances of the 

case, Agency counsel may require the respondent to complete a financial 

information request form, answer written interrogatories, or submit 

independent verification of his or her financial information. If the 

respondent does not submit the requested financial information, he or 

she will be presumed to have the ability to pay the penalty.

    (d) Financial information relevant to a respondent's ability to pay 

includes, but is not limited to, the value of respondent's cash and 

liquid assets, ability to borrow, net worth, liabilities, income, prior 

and anticipated profits, expected cash flow, and the respondent's 

ability to pay in installments over time. A respondent will be 

considered able to pay a penalty even if he or she must take such 

actions as pay in installments over time, borrow money, liquidate 

assets, or reorganize his or her business. NOAA's consideration of a 

respondent's ability to pay does not preclude an assessment of a penalty 

in an amount that would cause or contribute to the bankruptcy or other 

discontinuation of the respondent's business.

    (e) Financial information regarding respondent's ability to pay 

should be submitted to Agency counsel as soon after receipt of the NOVA 

as possible. If a respondent has requested a hearing on the offense 

alleged in the NOVA and wants his or her inability to pay considered in 

the initial decision of the Judge, verifiable financial information must 

be submitted to Agency counsel at least 15 days in advance of the 

hearing. In deciding whether to submit such information, the respondent 

should keep in mind that the Judge may assess de novo a civil penalty 

either greater or smaller than that assessed in the NOVA.

    (f) Issues regarding ability to pay will not be considered in an 

administrative review of an initial decision if the financial 

information was not previously presented by the respondent to the Judge 

at the hearing.

    (g) Whenever a statute requires NOAA to take into consideration a 

respondent's ability to pay when assessing a penalty, NOAA will take 

into consideration information available to it concerning a respondent's 

ability to pay. In such case, the NOVA will advise, in accordance with 

section 904.102 of this part, that respondent may seek to have the 

penalty amount modified by Agency counsel on the basis that he or she 

does not have the ability to pay the penalty assessed. A request to have 

the penalty amount modified on this basis must be made in accordance 

with Sec. 904.102 of this part and should be accompanied by supporting 

financial information. Agency counsel may request the respondent to 

submit such additional verifiable financial information as Agency 

counsel determines is necessary to evaluate the respondent's financial 

condition (such as by responding to a financial request form or written 

interrogatories, or by authorizing independent verification of 

respondent's financial condition). A respondent's failure to provide the 

requested information may serve as the basis for inferring that such 

information would not have supported the respondent's assertion of 

inability to pay the penalty assessed in the NOVA If the respondent has 

requested a hearing on the offense alleged in the NOVA, the Agency must 

submit information on the respondent's financial condition so that the 

Judge may consider that information, along with any other factors 

required to be considered, in the Judge's de novo assessment of a 

penalty. Agency counsel may obtain such financial information through 

discovery procedures under Sec. 904.240 of this part, or otherwise. A 

respondent's refusal or failure to respond to such discovery requests 

may serve as the basis for inferring that such information would have 

been adverse to any claim by respondent of inability to pay the assessed 

penalty, or result in respondent being barred from asserting financial 

hardship.



[52 FR 10325, Mar. 31, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 58485, Nov. 2, 1993]



[[Page 46]]