[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 15, Volume 3]

[Revised as of January 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 15CFR918.3]



[Page 88-89]

 

                  TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND FOREIGN TRADE

 

CHAPTER IX--NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT 

                               OF COMMERCE

 

PART 918_SEA GRANTS--Table of Contents

 

Sec. 918.3  Eligibility, qualifications, and responsibility of a Sea 

Grant College.



    (a) To be eligible for designation as a Sea Grant College, the 

institution of higher education or confederation of such institutions 

must have demonstrated a capability to maintain a high quality and 

balanced program of research, education, training, and advisory services 

in fields related to ocean, Great Lakes, and coastal resources for a 

minimum of three years, and have received financial assistance as an 

Institutional program under either section 205 of the National Sea Grant 

College Program Act or under section 204(c) of the earlier National Sea 

Grant College and Program Act of 1966.

    (b) To be eligible for designation as a Sea Grant College, the 

candidate institution or confederation of institutions must meet the 

qualifications set forth above as evaluated by a site review team 

composed of members of the Sea Grant Review Panel, NOAA's Office of Sea 

Grant, and other experts named by NOAA. As a result of this review, the 

candidate must be rated highly in all of the following qualifying areas:

    (1) Leadership. The Sea Grant College candidate must have achieved 

recognition as an intellectual and practical leader in marine science, 

engineering, education, and advisory service in its state and region.

    (2) Organization. The Sea Grant College candidate must have created 

the management organization to carry on a viable and productive Sea 

Grant Program, and must have the backing of its administration at a 

sufficiently high level to fulfill its multidisciplinary and 

multifaceted mandate.

    (3) Relevance. The Sea Grant College candidate's program must be 

relevant to local, State, regional, or National opportunities and 

problems in the marine environment. Important factors in evaluating 

relevance are the need for marine resource emphasis and the extent to 

which capabilities have been developed to be responsive to that need.

    (4) Programmed team approach. The Sea Grant College candidate must 

have a programmed team approach to the solution of marine problems which 

includes relevant, high quality, multidisciplinary research with 

associated educational and advisory services capable of producing 

identifiable results.

    (5) Education and training. Education and training must be clearly 

relevant to National, regional, State and local needs in fields related 

to ocean, Great Lakes, and coastal resources. As appropriate, education 

may include pre-college, college, post-graduate, public and adult 

levels.

    (6) Advisory services. The Sea Grant College candidate must have a 

strong program through which information, techniques,and research 

results from any reliable source, domestic or international, may be 

communicated to and utilized by user communities. In addition to the 

educational and information dissemination role, the advisory service 

program must aid in the identification and communication of user 

communities' research and educational needs.

    (7) Relationships. The Sea Grant College candidate must have close 

ties with Federal agencies. State agencies and administrations, local 

authorities, business and industry, and other educational institutions. 

These ties are: (i) To ensure the relevance of its programs, (ii) to 

give assistance to the



[[Page 89]]



broadest possible audience, (iii) to involve a broad pool of talent in 

providing this assistance (including universities and other 

administrative entities outside the Sea Grant College), and (iv) to 

assist others in developing research and management competence. The 

extent and quality of an institution's relationships are critical 

factors in evaluating the institutional program.

    (8) Productivity. The Sea Grant College candidate must have 

demonstrated the degree of productivity (of research results, reports, 

employed students, service to State agencies and industry, etc.) 

commensurate with the length of its Sea Grant operations and the level 

of funding under which it has worked.

    (9) Support. The Sea Grant College candidate must have the ability 

to obtain matching funds from non-Federal sources, such as state 

legislatures, university management, state agencies, business, and 

industry. A diversity of matching fund sources is encouraged as a sign 

of program vitality and the ability to meet the Sea Grant requirement 

that funds for the general programs be matched with at least one non-

Federal dollar for every two Federal dollars.

    (c) Finally, it must be found that the Sea Grant College candidate 

will act in accordance with the following standards relating to its 

continuing responsibilities if it should be designated a Sea Grant 

College:

    (1) Continue pursuit of excellence and high performance in marine 

research, education, training, and advisory services.

    (2) Provide leadership in marine activities including coordinated 

planning and cooperative work with local, state, regional, and Federal 

agencies, other Sea Grant Programs, and non-Sea Grant universities.

    (3) Maintain an effective management framework and application of 

institutional resources to the achievement of Sea Grant objectives.

    (4) Develop and implement long-term plans for research, education, 

training, and advisory services consistent with Sea Grant goals and 

objectives.

    (5) Advocate and further the Sea Grant concept and the full 

development of its potential within the institution and the state.

    (6) Provide adequate and stable matching financial support for the 

program from non-Federal sources.

    (7) Establish and operate an effective system to control the quality 

of its Sea Grant programs.