[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 15, Volume 3]

[Revised as of January 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 15CFR930.36]



[Page 247-248]

 

                  TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND FOREIGN TRADE

 

CHAPTER IX--NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT 

                               OF COMMERCE

 

PART 930_FEDERAL CONSISTENCY WITH APPROVED COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

--Table of Contents

 

           Subpart C_Consistency for Federal Agency Activities

 

Sec. 930.36  Consistency determinations for proposed activities.



    (a) Federal agencies shall review their proposed Federal agency 

activities which affect any coastal use or resource in order to develop 

consistency determinations which indicate whether such activities will 

be undertaken in a manner consistent to the maximum extent practicable 

with the enforceable policies of approved management programs. Federal 

agencies should consult with State agencies at an early stage in the 

development of the proposed activity in order to assess whether such 

activities will be consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the 

enforceable policies of such programs.

    (b) Timing of consistency determinations. (1) Federal agencies shall 

provide State agencies with a consistency determination at the earliest 

practicable time in the planning or reassessment of the activity. A 

consistency determination should be prepared following development of 

sufficient information to reasonably determine the consistency of the 

activity with the management program, but before the Federal agency 

reaches a significant point of decisionmaking in its review process, 

i.e., while the Federal agency has the ability to modify the activity. 

The consistency determination shall be provided to State agencies at 

least 90 days before final approval of the Federal agency activity 

unless both the Federal agency and the State agency agree to an 

alternative notification schedule.

    (2) Federal and State agencies may mutually agree upon procedures 

for extending the notification requirement beyond 90 days for activities 

requiring a substantial review period, and for shortening the 

notification period for activities requiring a less extensive review 

period, provided that public participation requirements are met.

    (c) General consistency determinations. In cases where Federal 

agencies will be performing repeated activity other than a development 

project (e.g., ongoing maintenance, waste disposal) which cumulatively 

has an effect upon any coastal use or resource, the Federal agency may 

develop a general consistency determination, thereby avoiding the 

necessity of issuing separate consistency determinations for each 

incremental action controlled by the major activity. A Federal agency 

may provide a State agency with a general consistency determination only 

in situations where the incremental actions are repetitive and do not 

affect any coastal use or resource when performed separately. A Federal 

agency and State agency may mutually agree on a general consistency 

determination for de minimis activities (see Sec. 930.33(a)(3)) or any 

other repetitive activity or category of activity(ies). If a Federal 

agency issues a general consistency determination, it shall thereafter 

periodically consult with the State agency to discuss the manner in 

which the incremental actions are being undertaken.

    (d) Phased consistency determinations. In cases where the Federal 

agency has sufficient information to determine the consistency of a 

proposed development project or other activity from planning to 

completion, the Federal agency shall provide the State agency with one 

consistency determination for the entire activity or development 

project. In cases where federal decisions related to a proposed 

development project or other activity will be made in phases based upon 

developing information that was not available at the time of the 

original consistency determination, with each subsequent phase subject 

to Federal agency discretion to implement alternative decisions based 

upon such information (e.g., planning, siting, and design decisions), a 

consistency determination will be required for each major decision. In 

cases of phased decisionmaking, Federal agencies shall ensure that the 

development project or



[[Page 248]]



other activity continues to be consistent to the maximum extent 

practicable with the management program.

    (e) National or regional consistency determinations. (1) A Federal 

agency may provide States with consistency determinations for Federal 

agency activities that are national or regional in scope (e.g., 

rulemaking, national plans), and that affect any coastal use or resource 

of more than one State. Many States share common coastal management 

issues and have similar enforceable policies, e.g., protection of a 

particular coastal resource. The Federal agency's national or regional 

consistency determination should, at a minimum, address the common 

denominator of these policies, i.e., the common coastal effects and 

management issues, and thereby address different States' policies with 

one discussion and determination. If a Federal agency decides not to use 

this section, it must issue consistency determinations to each State 

agency pursuant to Sec. 930.39.

    (2) Federal agency activities with coastal effects shall be 

consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable 

policies of each State's management program. Thus, the Federal agency's 

national or regional consistency determination shall contain sections 

that would apply to individual States to address coastal effects and 

enforceable policies unique to particular States, if common coastal 

effects and enforceable policies cannot be addressed under paragraph 

(e)(1). Early coordination with coastal States will enable the Federal 

agency to identify particular coastal management concerns and policies. 

In addition, the Federal agency could address the concerns of each 

affected State by providing for State conditions for the proposed 

activity. Further, the consistency determination could identify the 

coordination efforts and describe how the Federal agency responded to 

State agency concerns.