[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 29, Volume 3]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 29CFR825.220]



[Page 776-777]

 

                             TITLE 29--LABOR

 

         CHAPTER V--WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

PART 825_THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993--Table of Contents

 

 Subpart B_What Leave Is an Employee Entitled To Take Under the Family 

                         and Medical Leave Act?

 

Sec.  825.220  How are employees protected who request leave or otherwise 

assert FMLA rights?



    (a) The FMLA prohibits interference with an employee's rights under 

the law, and with legal proceedings or inquiries relating to an 

employee's rights. More specifically, the law contains the following 

employee protections:

    (1) An employer is prohibited from interfering with, restraining, or 

denying the exercise of (or attempts to exercise) any rights provided by 

the Act.

    (2) An employer is prohibited from discharging or in any other way 

discriminating against any person (whether or not an employee) for 

opposing or complaining about any unlawful practice under the Act.

    (3) All persons (whether or not employers) are prohibited from 

discharging or in any other way discriminating against any person 

(whether or not an employee) because that person has--

    (i) Filed any charge, or has instituted (or caused to be instituted) 

any proceeding under or related to this Act;

    (ii) Given, or is about to give, any information in connection with 

an inquiry or proceeding relating to a right under this Act;

    (iii) Testified, or is about to testify, in any inquiry or 

proceeding relating to a right under this Act.

    (b) Any violations of the Act or of these regulations constitute 

interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of rights 

provided by the Act. ``Interfering with'' the exercise of an employee's 

rights would include, for example, not only refusing to authorize FMLA 

leave, but discouraging an employee from using such leave. It would also 

include manipulation by a covered employer to avoid responsibilities 

under FMLA, for example:

    (1) transferring employees from one worksite to another for the 

purpose of reducing worksites, or to keep worksites, below the 50-

employee threshold for employee eligibility under the Act;

    (2) changing the essential functions of the job in order to preclude 

the taking of leave;

    (3) reducing hours available to work in order to avoid employee 

eligibility.

    (c) An employer is prohibited from discriminating against employees 

or prospective employees who have used FMLA leave. For example, if an 

employee on leave without pay would otherwise be entitled to full 

benefits (other than health benefits), the same benefits would be 

required to be provided to an employee on unpaid FMLA leave. By the same 

token, employers cannot use the taking of FMLA leave as a negative 

factor in employment actions, such as hiring, promotions or disciplinary 

actions; nor can FMLA leave be counted under ``no fault'' attendance 

policies.

    (d) Employees cannot waive, nor may employers induce employees to 

waive, their rights under FMLA. For example, employees (or their 

collective bargaining representatives) cannot ``trade off'' the right to 

take FMLA leave against some other benefit offered by the employer. This 

does not prevent an



[[Page 777]]



employee's voluntary and uncoerced acceptance (not as a condition of 

employment) of a ``light duty'' assignment while recovering from a 

serious health condition (see Sec.  825.702(d)). In such a circumstance 

the employee's right to restoration to the same or an equivalent 

position is available until 12 weeks have passed within the 12-month 

period, including all FMLA leave taken and the period of ``light duty.''

    (e) Individuals, and not merely employees, are protected from 

retaliation for opposing (e.g., file a complaint about) any practice 

which is unlawful under the Act. They are similarly protected if they 

oppose any practice which they reasonably believe to be a violation of 

the Act or regulations.