[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 32, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 32CFR22.420]



[Page 81-82]

 

                       TITLE 32--NATIONAL DEFENSE

 

              CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

 

PART 22_DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS_AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION--Table of 

Contents

 

     Subpart D_Recipient Qualification Matters_General Policies and 

                               Procedures

 

Sec.  22.420  Pre-award procedures.



    (a) The appropriate method to be used and amount of effort to be 

expended in deciding the qualification of a potential recipient will 

vary. In deciding on the method and level of effort, the grants officer 

should consider factors such as:

    (1) DoD's past experience with the recipient;

    (2) Whether the recipient has previously received cost-type 

contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements from the Federal 

Government; and

    (3) The amount of the prospective award and complexity of the 

project to be carried out under the award.

    (b) There is no DoD-wide requirement to obtain a pre-award credit 

report, audit, or any other specific piece of information. On a case-by-

case basis, the grants officer will decide whether there is a need to 

obtain any such information to assist in deciding whether the recipient 

meets the standards in Sec.  22.415 (a), (b), and (c).

    (1) Should the grants officer in a particular case decide that a 

pre-award credit report, audit, or survey is needed, he or she should 

consult first with the appropriate grants administration office 

(identified in Sec.  22.710), and decide whether pre-existing surveys or 

audits of the recipient, such as those of the recipient's internal 

control systems under OMB Circular A-133 \5\ will satisfy the need (see 

Sec.  22.715(a)(1)).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    \5\ Electronic copies may be obtained at Internet site http://

www.whitehouse.gov/OMB. For paper copies, contact the Office of 

Management and Budget, EOP Publications, 725 17th St. NW., New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    (2) If, after consulting with the grants administration office, the 

grants officer decides to obtain a credit report, audit, or other 

information, and the report or other information discloses that a 

potential recipient is delinquent on a debt to an agency of the United 

States Government, then:

    (i) The grants officer shall take such information into account when 

determining whether the potential recipient is qualified with respect to 

the grant or cooperative agreement; and

    (ii) If the grants officer decides to make the award to the 

recipient, unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise, the 

grants officer shall delay the award of the grant or cooperative 

agreement until payment is made or satisfactory arrangements are made to 

repay the debt.

    (c) In deciding whether a recipient is otherwise qualified and 

eligible in accordance with the standard in Sec.  22.415(d), the grants 

officer shall ensure that the potential recipient:

    (1) Is not identified in the Governmentwide Excluded Parties List 

System (EPLS) as being debarred, suspended, or otherwise ineligible to 

receive the award. (In addition to being a requirement for every new 

award, note that checking the EPLS also is a requirement for subsequent 

obligations of additional funds, such as incremental funding actions, 

for pre-existing awards to institutions of higher education, as 

described at 32 CFR 22.520(e)(2).) The grants officer's responsibilities 

include (see 32 CFR 25.425 and 25.430) checking the EPLS for:

    (i) Potential recipients of prime awards; and

    (ii) A recipient's principals (as defined at 32 CFR 25.995), 

potential recipients of subawards, and principals of those potential 

subaward recipients, if DoD Component approval of those principals of 

lower-tier recipients is required under the terms of the award (e.g., if 

a subsequent change in a recipient's principal investigator or other key 

person would be subject to the DoD Component's prior approval under 32 

CFR 32.25(c)(2), 33.30(d)(3), or 34.15(c)(i)).

    (2) Has provided all certifications and assurances required by 

Federal statute, Executive order, or codified regulation, unless they 

are to be addressed in award terms and conditions at the time of award 

(see Sec.  22.510).



[[Page 82]]



    (3) Meets any eligibility criteria that may be specified in the 

statute authorizing the specific program under which the award is being 

made (see Sec.  22.210(a)(2)).

    (d) Grants officers shall obtain each recipient's Taxpayer 

Identification Number (TIN, which may be the Social Security Number for 

an individual and Employer Identification Number for a business or non-

profit entity) and notify the recipient that the TIN is being obtained 

for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent amounts that 

may arise out of the recipient's relationship with the Government. 

Obtaining the TIN and so notifying the recipient is a statutory 

requirement of 31 U.S.C. 7701, as amended by the Debt Collection 

Improvement Act of 1996 (section 31001(i)(1), Pub. L. 104-134).



[63 FR 12164, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 49464, Aug. 23, 2005]