[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 33, Volume 3]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 33CFR222.2]



[Page 218-220]

 

                TITLE 33--NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS

 

 CHAPTER II--CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF 

                                 DEFENSE

 

PART 222_ENGINEERING AND DESIGN--Table of Contents

 

Sec.  222.2  Acquisition of lands downstream from spillways for 

hydrologic safety purposes.









Sec.

222.2 Acquisition of lands downstream from spillways for hydrologic 

          safety purposes.

222.3 Clearances for power and communication lines over reservoirs.

222.4 Reporting earthquake effects.

222.5 Water control management (ER 1110-2-240).

222.6 National Program for Inspection of Non-Federal Dams.



    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 116(d); delegation in 49 CFR 1.45(b); 33 U.S.C. 

467 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 701, 701b, and 701c-1 and specific legislative 

authorization Acts and Public Laws listed in appendix E of Sec.  222.7.





    (a) Purpose. This regulation provides guidance on the acquisition of 

lands downstream from spillways for the purpose of protecting the public 

from hazards imposed by spillway discharges. Guidance contained herein 

is in addition to ER 405-2-150.

    (b) Applicability. This regulation is applicable to all OCE elements 

and all field operating agencies having civil works responsibilities.

    (c) Reference. ER 405-2-150.

    (d) Discussion. A policy of public safety awareness will be adhered 

to in all phases of design and operation of dam and lake projects to 

assure adequate security for the general public in areas downstream from 

spillways. A real estate interest will be required in those



[[Page 219]]



areas downstream of a spillway where spillway discharge could create or 

significantly increase a hazardous condition. The real estate interest 

will extend downstream to where the spillway discharge would not 

significantly increase hazards. A real estate interest is not required 

in areas where flood conditions would clearly be nonhazardous.

    (e) Hydrologic criteria. The construction and operation of a dam and 

spillway may create or aggravate a potential hazard in the spillway 

discharge area. Therefore, an appropriate solution should be developed 

in a systematic manner. All pertinent facts need to be considered to 

assure that the risk to non-Federal interests does not exceed conditions 

that would prevail without the project. General hydrologic engineering 

considerations are as follows:

    (1) Probability of spillway use. Pool elevation versus probability 

of filling relationships can change materially after initial 

construction. Spillway use may be more frequent than anticipated. The 

infrequent use of a spillway is not a basis for the lack of adequate 

downstream real estate interest.

    (2) Changes in project functions. Water resource needs within river 

basins change and pool levels may be adjusted to provide more 

conservation storage, particularly when high-level limited-service 

spillways are provided. Such changes normally increase spillway use and 

are to be considered.

    (3) Volume and velocity of spillway flow. The amount of flow and 

destructive force of the flow from a spillway during floods up to the 

spillway design flood can vary from insignificant to extremely hazardous 

magnitudes. The severity and area of hazard associated with spillway 

discharge will vary depending on specific project site conditions. 

Therefore, the hazard is to be analyzed on a project-by-project basis.

    (4) Development within floodway. If development within the floodway 

downstream from a spillway is not present at the time of project 

construction, the existence of the reservoir may encourage development. 

Adverse terrain conditions do not preclude development. Sparse present 

development is not a basis for lack of real estate acquisition.

    (5) Debris movement within floodway. The availability of erodible 

material in a spillway flow area intensifies the hazards of spillway 

flow. In fact, debris may be transported to downstream areas that 

otherwise would not be adversely affected. Extreme erosion may result 

from high velocities and turbulence. Both debris and erosion must be 

evaluated and considered.

    (6) Flood warning and response potential. Small projects generally 

have short time periods available to warn downstream inhabitants and may 

be unattended prior to spillway use. The ability to convince individuals 

to leave most of their worldly possessions to the ravages of spillway 

flow may be severely limited. In some cases flood warning systems may be 

necessary; however, this subject is beyond the scope of this regulation. 

Warning systems are not an adequate substitute for a real estate 

interest in lands downstream of spillways.

    (7) Location of spillway. Spillways should be located to minimize 

the hazards associated with their discharge and the total project cost 

(cost of spillway structure and downstream lands). Spillways, outlet 

works, stilling basins, and outlet channels should be designed to 

minimize hazards to downstream interest insofar as is engineeringly and 

economically reasonable.

    (f) Real estate. The real estate interest required downstream of 

spillways will be adequate to assure carrying out project purposes and 

to protect non-Federal interest from hazards created by spillway flows. 

The interest may be either fee or permanent easement. A permanent 

easement must exclude all overnight and/or permanent habitation, 

structures subject to damage by spillway flows and activities that would 

increase the potential hazards. No real estate interest is required for:

    (1) Areas where the imposed or aggravated flood condition is non-

hazardous. Affected interest should be informed of the nature of the 

imposed non-hazardous flood condition.

    (2) Areas where the construction and operation of a dam and spillway 

do not increase or create a hazardous condition.



[[Page 220]]



    (g) Alternative land uses. In some cases land downstream from 

spillways can be effectively used for purposes other than hydrologic 

safety. Therefore, the entire cost of these lands may not be an 

additional project cost. For example, the lands downstream of a spillway 

may be used for wildlife management essential to project purposes in 

lieu of other lands suitable for similar purposes at another location.

    (h) Procedural guidance. Procedures regarding the application of the 

principles outlined in the above paragraphs are as follows:

    (1) For various flood magnitudes up to the probable maximum flood 

determine the ``with'' and ``without project'' flood conditions 

downstream of a dam spillway for the following:

    (i) Flooded area.

    (ii) Flood depth.

    (iii) Flood duration.

    (iv) Velocities.

    (v) Debris and erosion.

    (2) Determine the combinations of flood magnitudes and the above 

flood conditions that could be the most hazardous and/or result in the 

greatest increase in hazard from ``without'' to ``with project'' flood 

conditions. Designate these combinations of flood magnitude and flood 

conditions as the critical conditions.

    (3) For the critical conditions selected above outline the areas 

where the project could increase and/or create (impose) one or more of 

the critical conditions. Areas where spillway flows do not create or 

increase flood conditions are excluded from further analysis.

    (4) Determine where the imposed critical conditions as outlined 

above would be hazardous and non-hazardous. Non-hazardous areas are 

defined as those areas where:

    (i) Flood depths are maximum of 2 feet in urban and rural areas.

    (ii) Flood depths are essentially non-damaging to urban property.

    (iii) Flood durations are a maximum of 3 hours in urban areas and 24 

hours in agricultural areas.

    (iv) Velocities do not exceed 4 feet per second.

    (v) Debris and erosion potentials are minimal.

    (vi) Imposed flood conditions would be infrequent. That is, the 

exceedence frequency should be less than 1 percent. Hazardous areas are 

those where any of the above criteria are exceeded.

    (5) Based upon the information developed above and the principles 

outlined in paragraphs (c) through (f) of this section, decide on the 

extent of area and estate required for hydrologic safety purposes.

    (i) Reporting. Lands to be acquired downstream from spillways and 

intended purposes will be identified and the cost included in 

feasibility reports and real estate design memoranda. Additional 

specific information in support of land acquisition should be provided 

in Phase I or Phase II general design memoranda (GDM) and dam 

modernization reports. This information should include topographic maps, 

area flooded maps, velocities, erosion and debris areas ``with'' and 

``without'' the project. Real estate boundaries and discussions of items 

in paragraph (h)(4) are also essential in the GDM's and dam 

modernization reports.



[43 FR 35481, Aug. 10, 1978. Redesignated at 60 FR 19851, Apr. 21, 1995]