[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 40, Volume 31]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 40CFR1065.309]



[Page 718-719]

 

                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT

 

         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)

 

PART 1065_ENGINE-TESTING PROCEDURES--Table of Contents

 

                Subpart D_Calibrations and Verifications

 

Sec.  1065.309  Continuous gas analyzer uniform response verification.



    (a) Scope and frequency. If you use more than one continuous gas 

analyzer to quantify a gaseous constituent, you must perform this 

verification. For example, if you determine NMHC as the difference 

between continuous THC and CH4 measurements, you must perform 

this verification on your NMHC measurement system. As another example if 

you determine NOX as the sum of separate continuous 

measurements of NO and NO2, you must perform this 

verification on your NOX measurement system. Also, you must 

perform this verification if you use one continuous analyzer to apply an 

interference compensation algorithm to another continuous gas analyzer. 

Perform this verification after initial installation or major 

maintenance. Also perform this verification if you reconfigure your 

system in a way that would change system response. For example, perform 

this verification if you add a significant volume to the transfer lines 

by increasing their length or by adding a filter; or if you change the 

frequency at which you sample and record gas-analyzer concentrations.

    (b) Measurement principles. This procedure verifies the time-

alignment and uniform response of combined continuous gas measurements.

    (c) System requirements. Demonstrate that combined continuous 

concentration measurements have a uniform rise and fall during a 

simultaneous to a step change in both concentrations. During a system 

response to a rapid change in multiple gas concentrations, demonstrate 

that the t50 times of all combined analyzers all occur at the 

same recorded second of data or between the same two recorded seconds of 

data.

    (d) Procedure. Use the following procedure to verify the response of 

a continuous gas analyzer system:

    (1) Instrument setup. Follow the analyzer system manufacturer's 

start-up and operating instructions. Adjust the system as needed to 

optimize performance.

    (2) Equipment setup. Using minimal gas transfer line lengths between 

all connections, connect a zero-air source to the inlet of a 100 [deg]C 

heated line. Connect the heated line outlet to one inlet of a 100 [deg]C 

heated fast-acting 3-way valve (2 inlets, 1 outlet). Using a gas 

divider, equally blend an NO-CO-CO2-

C3H8-CH4 (balance N2) span 

gas with a span gas of NO2 (balance N2). Connect 

the gas divider outlet to the inlet of a 50 [deg]C heated line. Connect 

the heated line outlet to the inlet of a 50 [deg]C gas bubbler filled 

with distilled water. Connect the bubbler outlet to another heated line 

at 100 [deg]C. Connect the outlet of the 100 [deg]C line to the other 

inlet of the 3-way valve. Connect the valve outlet to an overflow at the 

gas analyzer system's probe or to an overflow fitting between the probe 

and transfer line to all the analyzers being verified.

    (3) Data collection. (i) Switch the valve to flow zero gas.

    (ii) Allow for stabilization, accounting for transport delays and 

the slowest instrument's full response.

    (iii) Start recording data at the frequency used during emission 

testing.

    (iv) Switch the valve to flow span gas.

    (v) Allow for transport delays and the slowest instrument's full 

response.

    (vi) Repeat the steps in paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (v) of this 

section to record seven full cycles, ending with zero gas flowing to the 

analyzers.

    (vii) Stop recording.

    (e) Performance evaluations. Perform the following evaluations:

    (1) Uniform response evaluation. (i) Calculate the mean rise time, 

t10-90, mean fall time, t90-10 for each analyzer.

    (ii) Determine the maximum mean rise and fall times for the slowest 

responding analyzer in each combination of continuous analyzer signals 

that you use to determine a single emission concentration.

    (iii) If the maximum rise time or fall time is greater than one 

second, verify that all other gas analyzers combined with it have mean 

rise and fall times of at least 75% of that analyzer's response.

    (iv) If any analyzer has shorter rise or fall times, disperse that 

signal so that it better matches the rise and fall times of the slowest 

signal with which



[[Page 719]]



it is combined. We recommend that you perform dispersion using SAE 2001-

01-3536 (incorporated by reference in Sec.  1065.1010) as a guide.

    (v) Repeat this verification after optimizing your systems to ensure 

that you dispersed signals correctly. If after repeated attempts at 

dispersing signals your system still fails this verification, you may 

use the continuous analyzer system if the deficiency does not adversely 

affect your ability to show compliance with the applicable standards.

    (2) Time alignment evaluation. (i) After all signals are adjusted to 

meet the uniform response evaluation, determine the second at which--or 

the two seconds between which--each analyzer crossed the midpoint of its 

response, t50.

    (ii) Verify that all combined gas analyzer signals are time-aligned 

such that all of their t50 times occurred at the same second 

or between the same two seconds in the recorded data.

    (iii) If your system fails to meet this criterion, you may change 

the time alignment of your system and retest the system completely. If 

after changing the time alignment of your system, some of the 

t50 times still are not aligned, take corrective action by 

dispersing analyzer signals that have the shortest rise and fall times.

    (iv) If some t50 times are still not aligned after 

repeated attempts at dispersion and time alignment, you may use the 

continuous analyzer system if the deficiency does not adversely affect 

your ability to show compliance with the applicable standards.



         Measurement of Engine Parameters and Ambient Conditions