[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 40, Volume 31]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 40CFR798.5275]



[Page 190-192]

 

                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT

 

         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)

 

PART 798_HEALTH EFFECTS TESTING GUIDELINES--Table of Contents

 

                       Subpart F_Genetic Toxicity

 

Sec.  798.5275  Sex-linked recessive lethal test in drosophila 

melanogaster.



    (a) Purpose. The sex-linked recessive lethal (SLRL) test using 

Drosophila melanogaster detects the occurrence of mutations, both point 

mutations and small deletions, in the germ line of the insect. This test 

is a forward mutation assay capable of screening for mutations at about 

800 loci on the X-chromosome. This represents about 80 percent of all X-

chromosome loci. The X-chromosome represents approximately one-fifth of 

the entire haploid genome.

    (b) Definitions. (1) Lethal mutation is a change in the genome 

which, when expressed, causes death to the carrier.

    (2) Recessive mutation is a change in the genome which is expressed 

in the homozygous or hemizygous condition.

    (3) Sex-Linked genes are present on the sex (X or Y) chromosomes. 

Sex-linked genes in the context of this guideline refer only to those 

located on the X-chromosome.

    (c) Reference substances. These may include, but need not be limited 

to, ethyl methanesulfonate or N-nitroso-dimethylamine.

    (d) Test method--(1) Principle. Mutations in the X-chromosome of D. 

melanogaster are phenotypically expressed in males carrying the mutant 

gene. When the mutation is lethal in the hemizygous condition, its 

presence is inferred from the absence of one class of male offspring out 

of the two that are normally produced by a heterozygous female. The SLRL 

test takes advantage of these facts by means of specially marked and 

arranged chromosomes.

    (2) Description. Wild-type males are treated and mated to 

appropriate females. Female offspring are mated individually to their 

brothers, and in the next generation the progeny from each separate dose 

are scored for phenotypically wild-type males. Absence of these males 

indicates that a sex-linked recessive lethal mutation has occurred in a 

germ cell of the P1 male.

    (3) Drosophila stocks. Males of a well-defined wild type stock and 

females of the Muller-5 stock may be used. Other appropriately marked 

female stocks



[[Page 191]]



with multiple inverted X-chromosomes may also be used.

    (4) Control groups--(i) Concurrent controls. Concurrent positive and 

negative (vehicle) controls shall be included in each experiment.

    (ii) Positive controls. Examples of positive controls include ethyl 

methanesulfonate and N-nitroso-dimethylamine.

    (iii) Other positive controls. Other positive control reference 

substances may be used.

    (iv) Negative controls. Negative (vehicle) controls shall be 

included. The size of the negative (vehicle) control group shall be 

determined by the availability of appropriate laboratory historical 

control data.

    (5) Test chemicals--(i) Vehicle. Test chemicals should be dissolved 

in water. Compounds which are insoluble in water may be dissolved or 

suspended in appropriate vehicles (e.g., a mixture of ethanol and Tween-

60 or 80) and then diluted in water or saline prior to administration. 

Dimethylsulfoxide should br avoided as a vehicle.

    (ii) Dose levels. For the initial assessment of mutagenicity, it is 

sufficient to test a single dose of the test substance for screening 

purposes. This dose should be the maximum tolerated dose, or that which 

produces some indication of toxicity, or shall be the highest dose 

attainable. For dose-response purposes, at least three additional dose 

levels should be used.

    (iii) Route of administration. Exposure may be oral, by injection or 

by exposure to gases or vapors. Feeding of the test compound may be done 

in sugar solution. When necessary, substances may be dissolved in 0.7 

percent NaCl solution and injected into the thorax or abdomen.

    (e) Test performance--(1) Treatment and mating. Wild-type males (3 

to 5 days old) shall be treated with the test substance and mated 

individually to an appropriate number of virgin females from the Muller-

5 stock or females from another appropriately marked (with multiply-

inverted X-chromosomes) stock. The females shall be replaced with fresh 

virgins every 2 to 3 days to cover the entire germ cell cycle. The 

offspring of these females are scored for lethal effects corresponding 

to the effects on mature sperm, mid or late stage spermatids, early 

spermatids, spermatocytes and spermatogonia at the time of treatment.

    (2) F11 matings. Heterozygous F1 females from 

the above crosses shall be allowed to mate individually (i.e., one 

female per vial) with their brothers. In the F2 generation, 

each culture shall be scored for the absence of wild-type males. If a 

culture appears to have arisen from an F1 female carrying a 

lethal in the parental X-chromosome (i.e., no males with the treated 

chromosome are observed), daughters of that female with the same 

genotype shall be tested to ascertain if the lethality is repeated in 

the next generation.

    (3) Number of matings. (i) The test should be designed with a 

predetermined sensitivity and power. The number of flies in each group 

should reflect these defined parameters. The spontaneous mutant 

frequency observed in the appropriate control group will strongly 

influence the number of treated chromosomes that must be analysed to 

detect substances which show mutation rates close to those of the 

controls.

    (ii) Test results should be confirmed in a separate experiment.

    (f) Data and report--(1) Treatment of results. Data shall be 

tabulated to show the number of chromosomes tested, the number of 

nonfertile males and the number of lethal chromosomes at each exposure 

concentration and for each mating period for each male treated. Numbers 

of clusters of different size per male shall be reported.

    (2) Statistical evaluation. Data shall be evaluated by appropriate 

statistical techniques.

    (3) Interpretation of results. (i) There are several criteria for 

determining a positive result, one of which is a statistically 

significant dose-related increase in the number of sex-lined recessive 

lethals. Another criterion may be based upon detection of a reproducible 

and statistically significant positive response for at least one of the 

test points.



[[Page 192]]



    (ii) A test substance which does not produce either a statistically 

significant dose-related increase in the number of sex-linked recessive 

lethals or a statistically significant and reproducible positive 

response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in 

this system.

    (iii) Both biological and statistical significance should be 

considered together in the evaluation.

    (4) Test evaluation. (i) Positive results in the SLRL test in D. 

melanogaster indicate that under the test conditions the test agent 

causes mutations in germ cells of this insect.

    (ii) Negative results indicate that under the test conditions the 

test substance is not mutagenic in D. melanogaster.

    (5) Test report. In addition to the reporting recommendations as 

specified under 40 CFR part 792, subpart J the following specific 

information shall be reported.

    (i) Drosophila stock used in the assay, age of insects, number of 

males treated, number of sterile males, number of F2 cultures 

established, number of F2 cultures without progeny.

    (ii) Test chemical vehicle, treatment and sampling schedule, 

exposure levels, toxicity data, negative (vehicle) and positive 

controls, if appropriate.

    (iii) Criteria for scoring lethals.

    (iv) Number of chromosomes tested, number of chromosomes scored, 

number of chromosomes carrying a lethal mutation.

    (v) Historical control data, if available.

    (vi) Dose-response relationship, if applicable.

    (g) References. For additional background information on this test 

guideline the following references should be consulted:

    (1) Sobels, F.H., Vogel, E. ``The capacity of Drosophila for 

detecting relevant genetic damage,'' Mutation Research 41:95-106 (1976).

    (2) Wurgler F.E., Sobels F.H., Vogel E. ``Drosophila as assay system 

for detecting genetic changes,'' Handbook of mutagenicity test 

procedures. Eds. Kilbey, B.J., Legator, M., Nichols, W., Ramel, C., 

(Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, 1977) pp. 335-373.



[50 FR 39397, Sept. 27, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 19079, May 20, 1987]