[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 40, Volume 31]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 40CFR798.5395]



[Page 200-202]

 

                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT

 

         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)

 

PART 798_HEALTH EFFECTS TESTING GUIDELINES--Table of Contents

 

                       Subpart F_Genetic Toxicity

 

Sec.  798.5395  In vivo mammalian bone marrow cytogenetics tests: 

Micronucleus assay.



    (a) Purpose. The micronucleus test is a mammalian in vivo test which 

detects damage of the chromosomes or mitotic apparatus by chemicals. 

Polychromatic erythrocytes in the bone marrow of rodents are used in 

this assay. When the erythroblast develops into an erythrocyte the main 

nucleus is extruded and may leave a micronucleus in the cytoplasm. The 

visualization of micronuclei is facilitated in these cells because they 

lack a nucleus. Micronuclei form under normal conditions. The assay is 

based on an increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic 

erythrocytes in bone marrow of treated animals.

    (b) Definition. Micronuclei are small particles consisting of 

acentric fragments of chromosomes or entire chromosomes, which lag 

behind at anaphase of cell division. After telophase, these fragments 

may not be included in the nuclei of daughter cells and form single or 

multiple micronuclei in the cytoplasm.

    (c) Reference substances. Not applicable.

    (d) Test method--(1) Principle. (i) Animals are exposed to test 

substance by an appropriate route. They are sacrificed, the bone marrow 

extracted and smear preparations made and stained. Polychromatic 

erythrocytes are scored for micronuclei under the microscope.

    (ii) Micronuclei may also be detected in other test systems:

    (A) Tissue culture.

    (B) Plants.

    (C) Blood smears.

    (D) Fetal tissues.

    (E) Meiotic cells.

    (F) Hepatic cells.

    (iii) The present guideline is based on the mammalian bone marrow 

assay.

    (2) Description. The method employs bone marrow of laboratory 

mammals which are exposed to test substances.

    (3) Animal selection--(i) Species and strain. Mice are recommended. 

However, any appropriate mammalian species may be used.

    (ii) Age. Young adult animals shall be used.

    (iii) Number and sex. At least five female and five male animals per 

experimental and control group shall be used. Thus, 10 animals would be 

sacrificed per time per group if several test times after treatment were 

included in the experimental schedule. The use of a single sex or a 

smaller number of animals should be justified.

    (iv) Assignment to groups. Animals shall be randomized and assigned 

to treatment and control groups.

    (4) Control groups--(i) Concurrent controls. Concurrent positive and 

negative (vehicle) controls shall be included in each assay.

    (ii) Positive controls. A compound known to produce micronuclei in 

vivo shall be employed as the positive control.

    (5) Test chemicals--(i) Vehicle. When appropriate for the route of 

administration, solid and liquid test substances should be dissolved or 

suspended in distilled water or isotonic saline. Water insoluble 

chemicals may be dissolved or suspended in appropriate vehicles. The 

vehicle used shall neither interfere with the test compound nor produce 

toxic effects. Fresh preparations of the test compound should be 

employed.

    (ii) Dose levels. For an initial assessment, one dose of the test 

substance may be used, the dose being the maximum tolerated dose (to a 

maximum of 5,000 mg/kg) or that producing some indication of 

cytotoxicity, e.g., a change in the ratio of polychromatic to 

normochromatic erythrocytes. Additional dose levels may be used. For 

determination of dose response, at least three dose levels shall be 

used.



[[Page 201]]



    (iii) Route of administration. The usual routes of administration 

are IP or oral. Other routes may be appropriate.

    (iv) Treatment schedule. Test substances should generally be 

administered only once. However, based upon toxicological information a 

repeated treatment schedule may be employed.

    (e) Test performance--(1) Treatment and sampling times. (i) Animals 

shall be treated with the test substance once at the highest tolerated 

dose. Sampling times should coincide with the maximum responses of the 

assay which varies with the test substance. Therefore, using the highest 

dose, bone marrow samples should be taken at least three times, starting 

not earlier than 12 hours after treatment, with appropriate intervals 

following the first sample but not extending beyond 72 hours. When other 

doses are used sampling shall be at the maximum sensitive period, or, if 

that is not known, approximately 24 hours after treatment. Other 

appropriate sampling times may be used in addition. If the most 

sensitive interval is known and documented with data, only this one time 

point need be sampled.

    (ii) If a repeated treatment schedule is used, samples shall be 

taken at least three times, starting not earlier than 12 hours after the 

last treatment and at appropriate intervals following the first sample, 

but not extending beyond 72 hours.

    (iii) Bone marrow shall be obtained immediately after sacrifice. 

Cells shall be prepared, put on slides, spread as a smear and stained.

    (2) Analysis. Slides shall be coded before microscopic analysis. At 

least 1,000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal shall be scored for 

the incidence of micronuclei. The ratio of polychromatic to 

normochromatic erythrocytes should be determined for each animal by 

counting a total of 200 erythrocytes. To ensure consistency with OECD 

and other guidelines, 1,000 polychromatic erythrocytes are recommended. 

Additional information may be obtained by scoring normochromatic 

erythrocytes for micronuclei.

    (f) Data and report--(1) Treatment of results. Criteria for scoring 

micronuclei shall be given. Individual data shall be presented in a 

tabular form including positive and negative (vehicle) controls and 

experimental groups. The number of polychromatic erythrocytes scored, 

the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes, the percentage 

of micronucleated cells, the number of micronucleated normochromatic 

erythrocytes, and, if applicable, the percentage of micronucleated 

erythrocytes and the ratio of normochromatic to polychromatic 

erythrocytes shall be listed separately for each experimental and 

control animal. Absolute numbers shall be included if percentages are 

reported.

    (2) Statistical evaluation. Data should be evaluated by appropriate 

statistical methods.

    (3) Interpretation of results. (i) There are several criteria for 

determining a positive response, one of which is a statistically 

significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated 

polychromatic erythrocytes. Another criterion may be based upon 

detection of a reproducible and statistically significant positive 

response for at least one of the test substance concentrations.

    (ii) A test substance which does not produce either a statistically 

significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated 

polychromatic erythrocytes or a statistically significant and 

reproducible positive response at any one of the test points is 

considered nonmutagenic in this system.

    (iii) Both biological and statistical significance should be 

considered together in the evaluation.

    (4) Test evaluation. (i) The results of the micronucleus test 

provide information on the ability of a chemical to induce micronuclei 

in polychromatic erythrocytes of the test species under the conditions 

of the test. This damage may have been the result of chromosomal damage 

or damage to the mitotic apparatus.

    (ii) Negative results indicate that under the test conditions the 

test substance does not produce micronuclei in the bone marrow of the 

test species.

    (5) Test report. In addition to the reporting recommendations as 

specified under 40 CFR part 792, subpart J, the following specific 

information shall be reported:



[[Page 202]]



    (i) Species, strain, age, weight, number and sex of animals in each 

treatment and control group.

    (ii) Test chemical vehicle, dose levels used, rationale for dose 

selection.

    (iii) Rationale for and description of treatment and sampling 

schedules, toxicity data, negative and positive controls.

    (iv) Details of the protocol used for slide preparation.

    (v) Criteria for identifying micronucleated erythrocytes.

    (vi) Dose-response relationship, if applicable.

    (g) References. For additional background information on this test 

guideline the following references should be consulted:

    (1) Cihak, R. ``Evaluation of benzidine by the micronucleus test,'' 

Mutation Research, 67: 383-384 (1979).

    (2) Cole, R.J., Taylor, N., Cole, J., Arlett, C.F. ``Short-term 

tests for transplacentally active carcinogens. 1. Micronucleus formation 

in fetal and maternal mouse erythroblasts,'' Mutation Research, 80: 141-

157 (1981).

    (3) Kliesch, U., Danford, N., Adler, I.D. ``Micronucleus test and 

bone-marrow chromosome analysis. A comparison of 2 methods in vivo for 

evaluating chemically induced chromosomal alterations,'' Mutation 

Research, 80: 321-332 (1981).

    (4) Matter, B., Schmid, W. ``Trenimon-induced chromosomal damage in 

bone-marrow cells of six mammalian species, evaluated by the 

micronucleus test,'' Mutation Research, 12: 417-425 (1971).

    (5) Schmid, W. ``The micronucleus test,'' Mutation Research, 31:9-15 

(1975).

    (6) Schmid, W. ``The micronucleus test for cytogenetic analysis,'' 

Chemical Mutagens, Principles and Methods for their Detection. Vol. 4 

Hollaender A, (Ed. A ed. (New York and London: Plenum Press, (1976) pp. 

31-53.

    (7) Heddle, J.A., Hite, M., Kurkhart, B., Mavournin, K., MacGregor, 

J.T., Newell, G.W., Salamone, M.F. ``The induction of micronuclei as a 

measure of genotoxicity. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Gene-Tox Program,'' Mutation Research, 123: 61-118 (1983).



[50 FR 39397, Sept. 27, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 19080, May 20, 1987; 

52 FR 26150, July 13, 1987; 52 FR 34654, Sept. 14, 1987]