[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 40, Volume 31]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 40CFR799.9365]



[Page 372-381]

 

                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT

 

         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)

 

PART 799_IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE AND MIXTURE 

TESTING REQUIREMENTS--Table of Contents

 

                Subpart H_Health Effects Test Guidelines

 

Sec.  799.9365  TSCA combined repeated dose toxicity study with the 

reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test.



    (a) Scope--(1) Applicability. This section is intended to meet 

testing requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 

U.S.C. 2601).

    (2) Source. The source material used in developing this TSCA test 

guideline is the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 

(OPPTS) harmonized test guideline 870.3650 (July 2000, final 

guidelines). This source is available at the address in paragraph (h) of 

this section.

    (b) Purpose. (1) This screening test provides limited information on 

systemic toxicity, neurotoxicity, and/or immunotoxicity following 

repeated exposure over a limited time period. In addition, it can be 

used to provide initial information on possible effects on



[[Page 373]]



male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, 

mating behavior, conception, development of the conceptus, and 

parturition. It is not an alternative to, nor does it replace, the 

existing test guidelines in Sec. Sec.  799.9370, 799.9380, 799.9620, and 

799.9780 of this part.

    (2) This test does not provide complete information on all aspects 

of reproduction and development. In particular, it offers only limited 

means of detecting postnatal manifestations of prenatal exposure, or 

effects that may be induced during postnatal exposure. Due (amongst 

other reasons) to the selectivity of the end points, and the short 

duration of the study, this method will not provide evidence for 

definite claims of no reproduction/developmental effects.

    (3) This test can be used to provide initial information either at 

an early stage of assessing the toxicological properties of chemicals, 

or chemicals of high concern. It can also be used as part of a set of 

initial screening tests for existing chemicals for which little or no 

toxicological information is available or when otherwise considered 

relevant. It also can serve as an alternative to conducting two separate 

screening tests for repeated dose toxicity as described in Sec.  

799.9305 of this part and reproductive/developmental toxicity as 

described in Sec.  799.9355 of this part.

    (c) Definitions. The definitions in section 3 of TSCA and in 40 CFR 

Part 792--Good Laboratory Practice Standards apply to this section. The 

following definitions also apply to this section.

    Dosage is a general term comprising dose, its frequency and the 

duration of dosing.

    Dose is the amount of test substance administered. Dose is expressed 

as weight (g, gm) or as weight of test substance per unit weight of test 

animal (e.g., mg/kg), or as constant dietary concentration (parts per 

million (ppm)).

    No-observed-effects level (NOEL) is the maximum dose used in a study 

which produces no adverse effects. The NOEL is expressed in terms of the 

weight of a test substance given daily per unit weight of test animal 

(milligrams per kilogram per day).

    (d) Principle of the test. (1) The test substance must be 

administered in graduated doses to several groups of males and females. 

Males should be dosed for a minimum of 4 weeks, up to and including the 

day before scheduled sacrifice (this includes a minimum of 2 weeks prior 

to mating, during the mating period and, approximately, 2 weeks post 

mating). In view of the limited pre-mating dosing period in males, 

fertility may not be a particularly sensitive indicator of testicular 

toxicity. Therefore, a detailed histological examination of the testes 

is essential. The combination of a pre-mating dosing period of 2 weeks 

and subsequent mating/fertility observations with an overall dosing 

period of at least 4 weeks, followed by detailed histopathology of the 

male gonads, is considered sufficient to enable detection of the 

majority of effects on male fertility and spermatogenesis.

    (2) Females should be dosed throughout the study. This includes 2 

weeks prior to mating (with the objective of covering at least two 

complete oestrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration 

of pregnancy and at least 4 days after delivery, up to and including the 

day before scheduled sacrifice.

    (3) Duration of study, following acclimatization, is dependent on 

the female performance and is approximately 54 days, (at least 14 days 

pre-mating, (up to) 14 days mating, 22 days gestation, 4 days 

lactation).

    (4) During the period of administration, the animals are observed 

closely each day for signs of toxicity. Animals which die or are 

sacrificed during the test are necropsied and, at the conclusion of the 

test, surviving animals are sacrificed and necropsied.

    (e) Description of the method--(1) Selection of animal species. This 

test guideline is designed for use with the rat. If other species are 

used, appropriate modifications will be necessary. Strains with low 

fecundity or well-known high incidence of developmental defects should 

not be used. Healthy virgin animals, not subjected to previous 

experimental procedures, should be used. The test animals should be 

characterised as to species, strain, sex,



[[Page 374]]



weight and/or age. At the commencement of the study the weight variation 

of animals used should be minimal and not exceed 20% of the mean weight of each sex. Where the study is 

conducted as a preliminary study to a long-term or a full-generation 

study, preferably animals from the same strain and source should be used 

in both studies.

    (2) Housing and feeding conditions. (i) The temperature in the 

experimental animal room should be 22 [deg]C (3[deg]). The relative humidity should be at least 30% 

and preferably not exceed 70% other than during room cleaning. Lighting 

should be artificial, the sequence being 12 hours light, 12 hours dark. 

For feeding, conventional laboratory diets may be used with an unlimited 

supply of drinking water. The choice of diet may be influenced by the 

need to ensure a suitable admixture of a test substance when 

administered by this method.

    (ii) Animals may be housed individually or be caged in small groups 

of the same sex; for group caging, no more than five animals should be 

housed per cage. Mating procedures should be carried out in cages 

suitable for the purpose. Pregnant females should be caged individually 

and provided with nesting materials.

    (3) Preparation of the animals. Healthy young adult animals must be 

randomised and assigned to the treatment groups and cages. Cages should 

be arranged in such a way that possible effects due to cage placements 

are minimized. The animals must be uniquely identified and kept in their 

cages for at least 5 days prior to the start of the study to allow for 

acclimatisation to the laboratory conditions.

    (4) Preparation of doses. (i) It is recommended that the test 

substance be administered orally unless other routes of administration 

are considered more appropriate. When the oral route is selected, the 

test compound is usually administered by gavage; however, alternatively, 

test compounds may also be administered via the diet or drinking water.

    (ii) Where necessary, the test substance is dissolved or suspended 

in a suitable vehicle. It is recommended that, wherever possible, the 

use of an aqueous solution/suspension be considered first, followed by 

consideration of a solution/emulsion in oil (e.g., corn oil) and then by 

possible solution in other vehicles. For non-aqueous vehicles the toxic 

characteristics of the vehicle must be known. The stability of the test 

substance in the vehicle should be determined.

    (f) Procedure--(1) Number and sex of animals. It is recommended that 

each group be started with at least 10 animals of each sex. Except in 

the case of marked toxic effects, it is expected that this will provide 

at least eight pregnant females per group which normally is the minimum 

acceptable number of pregnant females per group. The objective is to 

produce enough pregnancies and offspring to assure a meaningful 

evaluation of the potential of the substance to affect fertility, 

pregnancy, maternal and suckling behaviour, and growth and development 

of the F1 offspring from conception to day 4 post-partum. If 

interim sacrifices are planned, the number should be increased by the 

number of animals scheduled to be sacrificed before the completion of 

the study. Consideration should be given to an additional satellite 

group of five animals per sex in the control and the top dose group for 

observation of reversibility, persistence or delayed occurrence of 

systemic toxic effects, for at least 14 days post treatment. Animals of 

the satellite groups must not be mated and, consequently, must not used 

for the assessment of reproduction/developmental toxicity.

    (2) Dosage. (i) Generally, at least three test groups and a control 

group should be used. If there are no suitable general toxicity data 

available, a range finding study may be performed to aid the 

determination of the doses to be used. Except for treatment with the 

test substance, animals in the control group should be handled in an 

identical manner to the test group subjects. If a vehicle is used in 

administering the test substance, the control group should receive the 

vehicle in the highest volume used.

    (ii) Dose levels should be selected taking into account any existing 

toxicity and (toxico-) kinetic data available for the test compound or 

related



[[Page 375]]



materials. It should also be taken into account that there may be 

differences in sensitivity between pregnant and non-pregnant animals. 

The highest dose level should be chosen with the aim of inducing toxic 

effects but not death nor obvious suffering. Thereafter, a descending 

sequence of dose levels should be selected with a view to demonstrating 

any dosage related response and no adverse effects at the lowest dose 

level. Two- to four-fold intervals are frequently optimum and addition 

of a fourth test group is often preferable to using very large intervals 

(e.g., more than a factor of 10) between dosages.

    (3) Limit test. If an oral study at 1-dose level of at least 1000 

mg/kg body weight/day or, for dietary administration, an equivalent 

percentage in the diet, or drinking water (based upon body weight 

determinations), using the procedures described for this study, produces 

no observable toxic effects and if toxicity would not be expected based 

upon data from structurally related compounds, then a full study using 

several dose levels may not be considered necessary. The limit test 

applies except when human exposure indicates the need for a higher dose 

level to be used. For other types of administration, such as inhalation 

or dermal application, the physical chemical properties of the test 

substance often may dictate the maximum attainable exposure.

    (4) Administration of doses. (i) The animals are dosed with the test 

substance daily for 7 days a week. When the test substance is 

administered by gavage, this should be done in a single dose to the 

animals using a stomach tube or a suitable intubation cannula. The 

maximum volume of liquid that can be administered at one time depends on 

the size of the test animal. The volume should not exceed 1 ml/100 g 

body weight, except in the case of aqueous solutions where 2 ml/100 g 

body weight may be used. Except for irritating or corrosive substances 

which will normally reveal exacerbated effects with higher 

concentrations, variability in test volume should be minimized by 

adjusting the concentration to ensure a constant volume at all dose 

levels.

    (ii) For substances administered via the diet or drinking water, it 

is important to ensure that the quantities of the test substance 

involved do not interfere with normal nutrition or water balance. When 

the test substance is administered in the diet either a constant dietary 

concentration (parts per million (ppm)) or a constant dose level in 

terms of the animals' body weight may be used; the alternative used must 

be specified. For a substance administered by gavage, the dose should be 

given at similar times each day, and adjusted at least weekly to 

maintain a constant dose level in terms of animal body weight.

    (5) Experimental schedule. (i) Dosing of both sexes should begin 2 

weeks prior to mating, after they have been acclimatized for at least 5 

days. The study should be scheduled in such a way that mating begins 

soon after the animals have attained full sexual maturity. This may vary 

slightly for different strains of rats in different laboratories, e.g., 

Sprague Dawley rats 10 weeks of age, Wistar rats about 12 weeks of age. 

Dams with offspring should be sacrificed on day 4 post-partum, or 

shortly thereafter. In order to allow for overnight fasting of dams 

prior to blood collection (if this option is preferred), dams and their 

offspring need not necessarily be sacrificed on the same day. The day of 

birth (viz. when parturition is complete) is defined as day 0 post-

partum. Females showing no-evidence of copulation are sacrificed 24-26 

days after the last day of the mating period. Dosing is continued in 

both sexes during the mating period. Males should further be dosed after 

the mating period at least until the minimum total dosing period of 28 

days has been completed. They are then sacrificed, or, alternatively, 

are retained and continued to be dosed for the possible conduction of a 

second mating if considered appropriate.

    (ii) Daily dosing of the parental females should continue throughout 

pregnancy and at least up to, and including, day 3 post-partum or the 

day before sacrifice. For studies where the test substance is 

administered by inhalation or by the dermal route, dosing should be 

continued at least up to, and including, day 19 of gestation.



[[Page 376]]



    (iii) Animals in a satellite group scheduled for follow-up 

observations, if included, must not mated. They should be kept at least 

for a further 14 days after the first scheduled sacrifice of dams, 

without treatment to detect delayed occurrence, or persistence of, or 

recovery from toxic effects.

    (iv) The experimental schedule is given in the following figure 1.

    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15DE00.065

    

    (6) Mating procedure. Normally, 1:1 (one male to one female) matings 

should be used in this study. Exceptions can arise in the case of 

occasional deaths of males. The female should be placed with the same 

male until pregnancy occurs or 2 weeks have elapsed. Each morning the 

females should be examined for the presence of sperm or a vaginal plug. 

Day 0 of pregnancy is defined as the day a vaginal plug or sperm is 

found. In case pairing was unsuccessful, re-mating of females with 

proven males of the same group could be considered.

    (7) Observations. (i) General clinical observations should be made 

at least once a day, preferably at the same time(s) each day and 

considering the peak period of anticipated effects after dosing. The 

health condition of the animals should be recorded. At least twice daily 

all animals must be observed for morbidity and mortality.

    (ii) Once before the first exposure (to allow for within-subject 

comparisons), and at least once a week thereafter, detailed clinical 

observations should be made in all animals. These observations should be 

made outside the home cage in a standard arena and preferably at the 

same time, each day. They should be carefully recorded; preferably using 

scoring systems, explicitly defined by the testing laboratory. Effort 

should be made to ensure that variations in the test conditions are 

minimal and that observations are preferably conducted by observers 

unaware of the treatment. Signs noted should include, but not be limited 

to, changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of 

secretions and excretions and autonomic activity (e.g., lacrimation, 

piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, 

posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or 

tonic movements, stereotypies (e.g., excessive grooming, repetitive 

circling), difficult or prolonged parturition or bizarre behaviour 

(e.g., self-mutilation, walking backwards) should also be recorded.



[[Page 377]]



    (iii) At one time during the study, sensory reactivity to stimuli of 

different modalities (e.g., auditory, visual and proprioceptive stimuli) 

assessment of grip strength and motor activity assessment should be 

conducted in five males and five females, randomly selected from each 

group. Further details of the procedures that could be followed are 

given in the respective references. However, alternative procedures than 

those referenced could also be used. In males, these functional 

observations should be made towards the end of their dosing period, 

shortly before scheduled sacrifice but before blood sampling for 

hematology or clinical chemistry. Females should be in a physiologically 

similar state during these functional tests and should preferably be 

tested during lactation, shortly before scheduled sacrifice. In order to 

avoid hypothermia of pups, dams should be removed from the pups for not 

more than 30 to 40 minutes. Examples of procedures for observation are 

described in the references in paragraphs (h)(3), (h)(4), (h)(5), 

(h)(6), and (h)(7) of this section.

    (iv) Functional observations made once towards the end of the study 

may be omitted when the study is conducted as a preliminary study to a 

subsequent subchronic (90-day) or long-term study. In that case, the 

functional observations should be included in this follow-up study. On 

the other hand, the availability of data on functional observations from 

this repeated dose study may enhance the ability to select dose levels 

for a subsequent subchronic or long-term study.

    (v) Functional observations may also be omitted for groups that 

otherwise reveal signs of toxicity to an extent that would significantly 

interfere with the functional test performance.

    (vi) The duration of gestation should be recorded and is calculated 

from day 0 of pregnancy. Each litter should be examined as soon as 

possible after delivery to establish the number and sex of pups, 

stillbirths, live births, runts (pups that are significantly smaller 

than corresponding control pups), and the presence of gross 

abnormalities.

    (vii) Live pups should be counted and sexed and litters weighed 

within 24 hours of parturition (day 0 or 1 post-partum) and on day 4 

post-partum. In addition to the observations on parental animals, 

described by paragraphs (f)(7)(ii) and (f)(7)(iii) of this section, any 

abnormal behaviour of the offspring should be recorded.

    (8) Body weight and food/water consumption. (i) Males and females 

should be weighed on the first day of dosing, at least weekly 

thereafter, and at termination. During pregnancy, females should be 

weighed on days 0, 7, 14 and 20 and within 24 hours of parturition (day 

0 or 1 post-partum), and day 4 post-partum. These observations should be 

reported individually for each adult animal.

    (ii) During pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation, food consumption 

should be measured at least weekly. The measurement of food consumption 

during mating is optional. Water consumption during these periods should 

also be measured, when the test substance is administered by that 

medium.

    (9) Hematology. (i) Once during the study, the following 

hematological examinations should be made in five males and five females 

randomly selected from each group: hematocrit, hemoglobin concentration, 

erythrocyte count, total and differential leucocyte count, platelet 

count and a measure of blood clotting time/potential.

    (ii) Blood samples should be taken from a named site. Females should 

be in a physiologically similar state during sampling. In order to avoid 

practical difficulties related to the variability in the onset of 

gestation, blood collection in females may be done at the end of the 

pre-mating period as an alternative to sampling just prior to, or as 

part of, the procedure for sacrificing the animals. Blood samples of 

males should preferably be taken just prior to, or as part of, the 

procedure for sacrificing the animals. Alternatively, blood collection 

in males may also be done at the end of the pre-mating period when this 

time point was preferred for females.

    (iii) Blood samples should be stored under appropriate conditions.

    (10) Clinical biochemistry. (i) Clinical biochemistry determinations 

to investigate major toxic effects in tissues and, specifically, effects 

on kidney and liver, should be performed on blood



[[Page 378]]



samples obtained from the selected five males and five females of each 

group. Overnight fasting of the animals prior to blood sampling is 

recommended\1\. Investigations of plasma or serum must include sodium, 

potassium, glucose, total cholesterol, urea, creatinine, total protein 

and albumin, at least two enzymes indicative of hepatocellular effects 

(such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and 

sorbitol dehydrogenase) and bile acids. Measurements of additional 

enzymes (of hepatic or other origin) may provide useful information 

under certain circumstances.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    \1\ For a number of measurements in serum and plasma, most notably 

for glucose, overnight fasting would be preferable. The major reason for 

this preference is that the increased variability which would inevitably 

result from non-fasting, would tend to mask more subtle effects and make 

interpretation difficult. On the other hand, however, overnight fasting 

may interfere with the general metabolism of the (pregnant) animals, 

disturbs lactation and nursing behaviour, and, particularly in feeding 

studies, may disturb the daily exposure to the test substance. If 

overnight fasting is adopted, clinical biochemical determinations should 

be performed after the conduct of functional observations in week 4 of 

the study.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    (ii) Optionally, the following urinalysis determinations could be 

performed in five randomly selected males of each group during the last 

week of the study using timed urine volume collection; appearance, 

volume, osmolality or specific gravity, pH, protein, glucose and blood 

or blood cells.

    (iii) In addition, studies to investigate serum markers of general 

tissue damage should be considered. Other determinations that should be 

carried out if the known properties of the test substance may, or are 

suspected to, affect related metabolic profiles include calcium, 

phosphate, fasting triglycerides and fasting glucose, specific hormones, 

methemoglobin and cholinesterase. These need to be identified on a case-

by-case basis.

    (iv) Overall, there is a need for a flexible approach, depending on 

the observed and/or expected effect with a given compound.

    (v) If historical baseline data are inadequate, consideration should 

be given to determination of hematological and clinical biochemistry 

variables before dosing commences.

    (11) Pathology--(i) Gross necropsy. (A) All adult animals in the 

study must be subjected to a full, detailed gross necropsy which 

includes careful examination of the external surface of the body, all 

orifices, and the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities and their 

contents. Special attention should be paid to the organs of the 

reproductive system. The number of implantation sites should be 

recorded. Corpora lutea should be counted.

    (B) The testes and epididymides of all adult males should be weighed 

and the ovaries, testes, epididymides, accessory sex organs, and all 

organs showing macroscopic lesions of all adult animals, should be 

preserved.

    (C) In addition, for five adult males and females, randomly selected 

from each group, the liver, kidneys, adrenals, thymus, spleen, brain and 

heart should be trimmed of any adherent tissue, as appropriate and their 

wet weight taken as soon as possible after dissection to avoid drying. 

Of the selected males and females, the following tissues should also be 

preserved in the most appropriate fixation medium for both the type of 

tissue and the intended subsequent histopathological examination: all 

gross lesions, brain (representative regions including cerebrum, 

cerebellum and pons), spinal cord, stomach, small and large intestines 

(including Peyer's patches), liver, kidneys, adrenals, spleen, heart, 

thymus, thyroid, trachea and lungs (preserved by inflation with fixative 

and then immersion), uterus, urinary bladder, lymph nodes (preferably 1 

lymph node covering the route of administration and another one distant 

from the route of administration to cover systemic effects), peripheral 

nerve (sciatic or tibial) preferably in close proximity to the muscle, 

and a section of bone marrow (or, alternatively, a fresh mounted marrow 

aspirate).

    (D) Formalin fixation is not recommended for routine examination of 

testes and epididymides. An acceptable method is the use of Bouin's 

fixative for these tissues. The clinical and other findings may suggest 

the need to examine additional tissues. Also, any organs



[[Page 379]]



considered likely to be target organs based on the known properties of 

the test substance should be preserved.

    (E) Dead pups and pups sacrificed at day 4 post-partum, or shortly 

thereafter, should, at least, be carefully examined externally for gross 

abnormalities.

    (ii) Histopathology. (A) Full histopathology should be conducted on 

the preserved organs and tissues of the selected animals in the control 

and high dose groups and all gross lesions. These examinations should be 

extended to animals of other dosage groups if treatment-related changes 

are observed in the high dose group.

    (B) Detailed testicular histopathological examination (e.g., using 

Bouin's fixative, paraffin embedding and transverse sections of 4-5 

m thickness) should be conducted with special 

emphasis on stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology interstitial 

testicular cell structure. The evaluation should identify treatment-

related effects such as retained spermatids, missing germ cell layers or 

types, multinucleated giant cells or sloughing of spermatogenic cells 

into the lumen (the specifications for the evaluation are discussed in 

paragraph (g)(2) of this section). Examination of the intact epididymis 

should include the caput, corpus, and cauda, which can be accomplished 

by evaluation of a longitudinal section. The epididymis should be 

evaluated for leukocyte infiltration, change in prevalence of cell 

types, aberrant cell types, and phagocytosis of sperm. Periodic acid-

Schiff (PAS) and hematoxylin staining may be used for examination of the 

male reproductive organs. Histopathological examination of the ovary 

should detect qualitative depletion of the primordial follicle 

population.

    (C) When a satellite group is used, histopathology should be 

performed on tissues and organs identified as showing effects in the 

treated groups.

    (g) Data and reporting--(1) Data. Individual animal data should be 

provided. Additionally, all data should be summarised in tabular form, 

showing for each test group the number of animals at the start of the 

test, the number of animals found dead during the test or sacrificed for 

humane reasons, the time of any death or humane sacrifice, the number of 

fertile animals, the number of pregnant females, the number of animals 

showing signs of toxicity, a description of the signs of toxicity 

observed, including time of onset, duration, and severity of any toxic 

effects, the types of histopathological changes, and all relevant litter 

data.

    (2) Evaluation of results. (i) The findings of this toxicity study 

should be evaluated in terms of the observed effects, necropsy and 

microscopic findings. The evaluation will include the relationship 

between the dose of the test substance and the presence or absence, 

incidence and severity of abnormalities, including gross lesions, 

identified target organs, infertility, clinical abnormalities, affected 

reproductive and litter performance, body weight changes, effects on 

mortality and any other toxic effects.

    (ii) Because of the short period of treatment of the male, the 

histopathology of the testes and epididymides must be considered along 

with the fertility data, when assessing male reproduction effects. The 

use of historic control data on reproduction/development (e.g. for 

litter size) where available may also be useful as an aid to the 

interpretation of the study.

    (iii) When possible, numerical results should be evaluated by an 

appropriate and general acceptable statistical method. The statistical 

methods should be selected during the design of the study. Due to the 

limited dimensions of the study, statistical analysis in the form of 

tests for ``significance'' are of limited value for many endpoints, 

especially reproductive endpoints. Some of the most widely used methods, 

especially parametric tests for measures of central tendency, are 

inappropriate. If statistical analyses are used then the method chosen 

should be appropriate for the distribution of the variable examined and 

be selected prior to the start of the study.

    (3) Test report. The test report must include the following 

information:

    (i) Test substance:

    (A) Physical nature and, where relevant, physicochemical properties.

    (B) Identification data.



[[Page 380]]



    (ii) Vehicle (if appropriate): Justification for choice of vehicle, 

if other than water.

    (iii) Test animals:

    (A) Species/strain used.

    (B) Number, age and sex of animals.

    (C) Source, housing conditions, diet, etc.

    (D) Individual weights of animals at the start of the test.

    (iv) Test conditions:

    (A) Rationale for dose level selection.

    (B) Details of test substance formulation/diet preparation, achieved 

concentration, stability and homogeneity of the preparation.

    (C) Details of the administration of the test substance.

    (D) Conversion from diet/drinking water test substance concentration 

(parts per mission (ppm)) to the actual dose (mg/kg body weight/day), if 

applicable.

    (E) Details of food and water quality.

    (v) Results (toxic response data by sex and dose):

    (A) Time of death during the study or whether animals survived to 

termination.

    (B) Nature, severity and duration of clinical observations (whether 

reversible or not).

    (C) Body weight/body weight change data.

    (D) Food consumption and water consumption, if applicable.

    (E) Sensory activity, grip strength and motor activity assessments.

    (F) Hematological tests with relevant baseline values,

    (G) Clinical biochemistry tests with relevant baseline values.

    (H) Effects on reproduction, including information on mating/

precoital interval, fertility, fecundity and gestation duration.

    (I) Effects on offspring, including number of pups born (live and 

dead), sex ratio, postnatal growth (pup weights) and survival (litter 

size), gross abnormalities and clinical observations during lactation.

    (J) Body weight at termination and organ weight data for the 

parental animals.

    (K) Necropsy data, including number of implantations and number of 

corpora lutea.

    (L) Calculations of pre- and postimplantation loss.

    (M) Detailed description of histopathological findings.

    (N) Statistical treatment of results, where appropriate.

    (vi) Discussion of results.

    (vii) Conclusions.

    (h) References. For additional background information on this test 

guideline, the following references should be consulted. These 

references are available for inspection at the TSCA Nonconfidential 

Information Center, Rm. NE-B607, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 

St., NW., Washington, DC, 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except legal holidays.

    (1) Mitsumori, K., Kodama, Y., Uchida, O., Takada, K., Saito, M. 

Naito, K., Tanaka, S., Kurokawa, Y., Usami, M., Kawashima, K., Yasuhara, 

K., Toyoda, K., Onodera, H., Furukawa, F., Takahashi, M. and Hayashi, 

Y., (1994). Confirmation Study, Using Nitro-Benzene, of the Combined 

Repeat Dose and Reproductive/ Developmental Toxicity Test Protocol 

Proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 

(OECD). Journal of Toxicology and Science, 19:141-149.

    (2) Tanaka, S., Kawashima, K., Naito, K., Usami, M., Nakadate, M., 

Imaida, K., Takahashi, M., Hayashi, Y., Kurokawa, Y. and Tobe, M. 

(1992). Combined Repeat Dose and Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity 

Screening Test (OECD): Familiarization Using Cyclophosphamide. 

Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 18:89-95.

    (3) Tupper D.E., Wallace R.B. (1980). Utility of the Neurologic 

Examination in Rats. Acta Neurobiological Exposure, 40:999-1003.

    (4) Gad S.C. (1982). A Neuromuscular Screen for Use in Industrial 

Toxicology. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 9:691-704.

    (5) Moser V.C., McDaniel K.M., Phillips P.M. (1991). Rat Strain and 

Stock Comparisons Using a Functional Observational Battery: Baseline 

Values and Effects of Amitraz. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 

108:267-283.

    (6) Meyer O.A., Tilson H.A., Byrd W.C., Riley M.T. (1979). A Method 

for the Routine Assessment of Fore- and Hindlimb Grip Strength of Rats 

and



[[Page 381]]



Mice. Neurobehavorial Toxicology, 1:233-236.

    (7) Crofton K.M., Howard J.L., Moser V.C., Gill M.W., Reiter L.W., 

Tilson H.A., MacPhail R.C. (1991). Interlaboratory Comparison of Motor 

Activity Experiments: Implication for Neurotoxicological Assessments. 

Neurotoxicology and Teratology 13:599-609.



[65 FR 78793, Dec. 15, 2000]