[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 42, Volume 4]

[Revised as of October 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 42CFR488.8]



[Page 662-665]

 

                         TITLE 42--PUBLIC HEALTH

 

  CHAPTER IV--CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF 

                  HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED)

 

PART 488_SURVEY, CERTIFICATION, AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES--Table of 

 

                      Subpart A_General Provisions

 

Sec.  488.8  Federal review of accreditation organizations.



    (a) Review and approval of national accreditation organization. 

CMS's review and evaluation of a national accreditation organization 

will be conducted in accordance with, but will not necessarily be 

limited to, the following general criteria--

    (1) The equivalency of an accreditation organization's accreditation 

requirements of an entity to the comparable CMS requirements for the 

entity;

    (2) The organization's survey process to determine--

    (i) The composition of the survey team, surveyor qualifications, and 

the ability of the organization to provide continuing surveyor training;

    (ii) The comparability of survey procedures to those of State survey 

agencies, including survey frequency, and the ability to investigate and 

respond appropriately to complaints against accredited facilities;

    (iii) The organization's procedures for monitoring providers or 

suppliers found by the organization to be out of compliance with program 

requirements. These monitoring procedures



[[Page 663]]



are to be used only when the organization identifies noncompliance. If 

noncompliance is identified through validation surveys, the State survey 

agency monitors corrections as specified at Sec.  488.7(b)(3);

    (iv) The ability of the organization to report deficiencies to the 

surveyed facilities and respond to the facility's plan of correction in 

a timely manner;

    (v) The ability of the organization to provide CMS with electronic 

data in ASCII comparable code and reports necessary for effective 

validation and assessment of the organization survey process;

    (vi) The adequacy of staff and other resources;

    (vii) The organization's ability to provide adequate funding for 

performing required surveys; and

    (viii) The organization's policies with respect to whether surveys 

are announced or unannounced; and

    (3) The accreditation organization's agreement to provide CMS with a 

copy of the most current accreditation survey together with any other 

information related to the survey as CMS may require (including 

corrective action plans).

    (b) Notice and comment. (1) CMS will publish a proposed notice in 

the Federal Register whenever it contemplates approving an accreditation 

organization's application for deeming authority. The proposed notice 

will specify the basis for granting approval of deeming authority and 

the types of providers and suppliers accredited by the organization for 

which deeming authority would be approved. The proposed notice will also 

describe how the accreditation organization's accreditation program 

provides reasonable assurance that entities accredited by the 

organization meet Medicare requirements. The proposed notice will also 

provide opportunity for public comment.

    (2) CMS will publish a final notice in the Federal Register whenever 

it grants deeming authority to a national accreditation organization. 

Publication of the final notice will follow publication of the proposed 

notice by at least six months. The final notice will specify the 

effective date of the approval of deeming authority and the term of 

approval (which will not exceed six years).

    (c) Effects of approval of an accreditation organization. CMS will 

deem providers and suppliers accredited by an approved accreditation 

organization to meet the Medicare conditions for which the approval of 

deeming authority has specifically been granted. The deeming authority 

will take effect 90 days following the publication of the final notice.

    (d) Continuing Federal oversight of equivalency of an accreditation 

organization and removal of deeming authority. This paragraph 

establishes specific criteria and procedures for continuing oversight 

and for removing the approval of deeming authority of a national 

accreditation organization.

    (1) Comparability review. CMS will compare the equivalency of an 

accreditation organization's accreditation requirements to the 

comparable CMS requirements if--

    (i) CMS imposes new requirements or changes its survey process;

    (ii) An accreditation organization proposes to adopt new 

requirements or change its survey process. An accreditation organization 

must provide written notification to CMS at least 30 days in advance of 

the effective date of any proposed changes in its accreditation 

requirements or survey process; and

    (iii) An accreditation organization's approval has been in effect 

for the maximum term specified by CMS in the final notice.

    (2) Validation review. Following the end of a validation review 

period, CMS will identify any accreditation programs for which--

    (i) Validation survey results indicate a rate of disparity between 

certifications of the accreditation organization and certification of 

the State agency of 20 percent or more; or

    (ii) Validation survey results, irrespective of the rate of 

disparity, indicate widespread or systematic problems in an 

organization's accreditation process that provide evidence that there is 

no longer reasonable assurance that accredited entities meet Medicare 

requirements.

    (3) Reapplication procedures. (i) Every six years, or sooner as 

determined by



[[Page 664]]



CMS, an approved accreditation organization must reapply for continued 

approval of deeming authority. CMS will notify the organization of the 

materials the organization must submit as part of the reapplication 

procedure.

    (ii) An accreditation organization that is not meeting the 

requirements of this subpart, as determined through a comparability 

review, must furnish CMS, upon request and at any time, with the 

reapplication materials CMS requests. CMS will establish a deadline by 

which the materials are to be submitted.

    (e) Notice. If a comparability or validation review reveals 

documentation that an accreditation organization is not meeting the 

requirements of this subpart, CMS will provide written notice to the 

organization indicating that its deeming authority approval may be in 

jeopardy and that a deeming authority review is being initiated. The 

notice provides the following information--

    (1) A statement of the requirements, instances, rates or patterns of 

discrepancies that were found as well as other related documentation;

    (2) An explanation of CMS's deeming authority review on which the 

final determination is based;

    (3) A description of the process available if the accreditation 

organization wishes an opportunity to explain or justify the findings 

made during the comparability or validation review;

    (4) A description of the possible actions that may be imposed by CMS 

based on the findings from the validation review; and

    (5) The reapplication materials the organization must submit and the 

deadline for their submission.

    (f) Deeming authority review. (1) CMS will conduct a review of an 

accreditation organization's accreditation program if the comparability 

or validation review produces findings as described at paragraph (d)(1) 

or (2), respectively, of this section. CMS will review as appropriate 

either or both--

    (i) The requirements of the accreditation organization; or

    (ii) The criteria described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section to 

reevaluate whether the accreditation organization continues to meet all 

these criteria.

    (2) If CMS determines, following the deeming authority review, that 

the accreditation organization has failed to adopt requirements 

comparable to CMS's or submit new requirements timely, the accreditation 

organization may be given a conditional approval of its deeming 

authority for a probationary period of up to 180 days to adopt 

comparable requirements.

    (3) If CMS determines, following the deeming authority review, that 

the rate of disparity identified during the validation review meets 

either of the criteria set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this section 

CMS--

    (i) May give the accreditation organization conditional approval of 

its deeming authority during a probationary period of up to one year 

(whether or not there are also noncomparable requirements) that will be 

effective 30 days following the date of this determination;

    (ii) Will require the accreditation organization to release to CMS 

upon its request any facility-specific data that is required by CMS for 

continued monitoring:

    (iii) Will require the accreditation organization to provide CMS 

with a survey schedule for the purpose of intermittent onsite monitoring 

by CMS staff, State surveyors, or both; and

    (iv) Will publish in the Medicare Annual Report to Congress the name 

of any accreditation organization given a probationary period by CMS.

    (4) Within 60 days after the end of any probationary period, CMS 

will make a final determination as to whether or not an accreditation 

program continues to meet the criteria described at paragraph (a)(1) of 

this section and will issue an appropriate notice (including reasons for 

the determination) to the accreditation organization and affected 

providers or suppliers. This determination will be based on any of the 

following--

    (i) The evaluation of the most current validation survey and review 

findings. The evaluation must indicate an acceptable rate of disparity 

of less than 20 percent between the certifications of the accreditation 

organization and the certifications of the State agency as



[[Page 665]]



described at paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section in order for the 

accreditation organization to retain its approval;

    (ii) The evaluation of facility-specific data, as necessary, as well 

as other related information;

    (iii) The evaluation of an accreditation organization's surveyors in 

terms of qualifications, ongoing training composition of survey team, 

etc.;

    (iv) The evaluation of survey procedures; or

    (v) The accreditation requirements.

    (5) If the accreditation program has not made improvements 

acceptable to CMS during the probationary period, CMS may remove 

recognition of deemed authority effective 30 days from the date that it 

provides written notice to the organization that its deeming authority 

will be removed.

    (6) The existence of any validation review, deeming authority 

review, probationary period, or any other action by CMS, does not affect 

or limit the conducting of any validation survey.

    (7) CMS will publish a notice in the Federal Register containing a 

justification of the basis for removing the deeming authority from an 

accreditation organization. The notice will provide the reasons the 

accreditation organization's accreditation program no longer meets 

Medicare requirements.

    (8) After CMS removes approval of an accreditation organization's 

deeming authority, an affected provider's or supplier's deemed status 

continues in effect 60 days after the removal of approval. CMS may 

extend the period for an additional 60 days for a provider or supplier 

if it determines that the provider or supplier submitted an application 

within the initial 60 day timeframe to another approved accreditation 

organization or to CMS so that a certification of compliance with 

Medicare conditions can be determined.

    (9) Failure to comply with the timeframe requirements specified in 

paragraph (f)(8) of this section will jeopardize a provider's or 

supplier's participation in the Medicare program and where applicable in 

the Medicaid program.

    (g) If at any time CMS determines that the continued approval of 

deeming authority of any accreditation organization poses an immediate 

jeopardy to the patients of the entities accredited by that 

organization, or such continued approval otherwise constitutes a 

significant hazard to the public health, CMS may immediately withdraw 

the approval of deeming authority of that accreditation organization.

    (h) Any accreditation organization dissatisfied with a determination 

to remove its deeming authority may request a reconsideration of that 

determination in accordance with subpart D of this part.



[58 FR 61841, Nov. 23, 1993]