[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 15]
[Revised as of January 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR31.3121(a)(8)-1]

[Page 30-32]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 31_EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE--Table 
 
  Subpart B_Federal Insurance Contributions Act (Chapter 21, Internal 
                          Revenue Code of 1954)
 
Sec.  31.3121(a)(8)-1  Payments for agricultural labor.

    (a) Scope of this section. For purposes of the regulations in this 
section, the term ``agricultural labor'' means only such agricultural 
labor (see Sec.  31.3121(g)-1) as constitutes employment or is deemed to 
constitute employment by reason of the rules relating to included and 
excluded services contained in section 3121(c) (see Sec.  31.3121(c)-1) 
or the corresponding section of prior law.

[[Page 31]]

    (b) Payments other than in cash. The term ``wages'' does not include 
remuneration paid in any medium other than cash for agricultural labor. 
For meaning of the term ``cash remuneration'', see paragraph (f) of the 
regulations in this section.
    (c) Cash payments. (1) The term wages does not include cash 
remuneration paid by an employer in any calendar year to an employee for 
agricultural labor unless--
    (i) The cash remuneration paid in such year by the employer to the 
employee for such labor is $150 or more; or
    (ii) The employer's expenditures for agricultural labor in such year 
equal or exceed $2,500, except that this paragraph (c)(1)(ii) shall not 
apply in determining whether remuneration paid to an employee 
constitutes wages for agricultural labor if such employee--
    (A) Is employed as a hand-harvest laborer and is paid on a piece 
rate basis in an operation which has been, and is customarily and 
generally recognized as having been, paid on a piece rate basis in the 
region of employment;
    (B) Commutes daily from his permanent residence to the farm on which 
he is so employed; and
    (C) Has been employed in agriculture less than 13 weeks during the 
preceding calendar year.
    (2) The application of the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this 
section may be illustrated by the following example:

    Example. Employer X pays A $140 in cash for agricultural labor in 
calendar year 2004. X makes no other payments to A during the year and 
makes no other payment for agricultural labor to any other employee. 
Employee A is not employed as a hand-harvest laborer. Neither the $150-
cash-remuneration test nor the $2,500-employer's-expenditures-for-
agricultural-labor test is met. Accordingly, the remuneration paid by X 
to A is not subject to the taxes. If in 2004 X had paid A $140 in cash 
for agricultural labor and had made expenditures of $2,360 or more to 
other employees for agricultural labor, the $140 paid by X to A would 
have been subject to tax because the $2,500-employer's-expenditures-for-
agricultural-labor test would have been met. Or, if X had paid A $150 in 
cash in 2004 and made no other payments to any other employee for 
agricultural labor, the $150 paid by X to A would have been subject to 
tax because the $150-cash-remuneration test would have been met.

    (d) Application of cash-remuneration test. (1) If an employee 
receives cash remuneration from an employer both for services which 
constitute agricultural labor and for services which do not constitute 
agricultural labor, only the amount of such remuneration which is 
attributable to agricultural labor shall be included in determining 
whether cash remuneration of $150 or more has been paid in the calendar 
year by the employer to the employee for agricultural labor. The 
following example illustrates this paragraph (d)(1):

    Example. Employer X operates a store and also is engaged in farming 
operations. Employee A, who regularly performs services for X in 
connection with the operation of the store, works on X's farm when 
additional help is required for the farm activities. In the calendar 
year 2004, X pays A $140 in cash for services performed in agricultural 
labor, and $4,000 for services performed in connection with the 
operation of the store. X has no additional expenditures for 
agricultural labor in 2004. Since the cash remuneration paid by X to A 
in the calendar year 2004 for agricultural labor is less than $150, the 
$150-cash-remuneration test is not met. The $140 paid by X to A in 2004 
for agricultural labor does not constitute wages and is not subject to 
the taxes.

    (2) The test relating to cash remuneration of $150 or more is based 
on the cash remuneration paid in a calendar year rather than on the 
remuneration earned during a calendar year. It is immaterial if such 
cash remuneration is paid in a calendar year other than the year in 
which the agricultural labor is performed. The following example 
illustrates this paragraph (d)(2):

    Example. Employer X pays cash remuneration of $150 in the calendar 
year 2004 to employee A for agricultural labor. Such remuneration 
constitutes wages even though $10 of such amount represents payment for 
agricultural labor performed by A for X in December 2003.
    (3) In determining whether $150 or more has been paid to an employee 
for agricultural labor, only cash remuneration for such labor shall be 
taken into account. If an employee receives cash remuneration in any one 
calendar year from more than one employer for agricultural labor, the 
cash-remuneration test is to be applied with respect to the remuneration 
received by the employee

[[Page 32]]

from each employer in such calendar year for such labor.
    (e) Application of employer's-expenditures-for-agricultural-labor 
test. (1) If an employer has expenditures in a calendar year for 
agricultural labor and for non-agricultural labor, only the amount of 
such expenditures for agricultural labor shall be included in 
determining whether the employer's expenditures for agricultural labor 
in such year equal or exceed $2,500. The following example illustrates 
this paragraph (e)(1):

    Example. Employer X operates a store and also is engaged in farming 
operations. Employee A, who regularly performs services for X in 
connection with the operation of the store, works on X's farm when 
additional help is required for the farm activities. In calendar year 
2004, X pays A $140 in cash for services performed in agricultural 
labor, and $4,000 for services performed in connection with the 
operation of the store. X has no additional expenditures for 
agricultural labor in 2004. Since X's expenditures for agricultural 
labor in 2004 are less than $2,500, the employer's-expenditures-for-
agricultural-labor test is not met. The $140 paid by X to A in 2004 for 
agricultural labor does not constitute wages and is not subject to the 
taxes.

    (2) The test relating to an employer's expenditures of $2,500 or 
more for agricultural labor is based on the expenditures paid by the 
employer in a calendar year rather than on the expenses incurred by the 
employer during a calendar year. It is immaterial if the expenditures 
are paid in a calendar year other than the year in which the 
agricultural labor is performed. The following example illustrates this 
paragraph (e)(2):

    Example. Employer X employs A to construct fences on a farm owned by 
X. The work constitutes agricultural labor and is performed over the 
course of November and December 2003. A is not employed by X at any 
other time, however X does have other employees to whom X pays 
remuneration of $2,000 for agricultural labor in 2003. X pays A $140 in 
cash in November 2003 and $140 in cash in January 2004, in full payment 
for the work. The $140 payment to A made in November is not wages for 
calendar year 2003 because the $150-cash-remuneration test is not met 
and X's total expenditures for agricultural labor for such year are not 
equal to or in excess of $2,500. The $140 payment to A made in January 
is not wages for 2004 because the $150 cash-remuneration test is not 
met. However, if X pays additional remuneration to employees for 
agricultural labor in 2004 that equals or exceeds $2,360, the 
employer's-expenditures-for-agricultural-labor test will be met and the 
$140 paid by X to A in 2004 will be considered wages. It is immaterial 
that the work was performed in 2003.
    (f) Meaning of ``cash remuneration.'' Cash remuneration includes 
checks and other monetary media of exchange. Cash remuneration does not 
include payments made in any other medium, such as lodging, food, 
clothing, car tokens, transportation passes or tickets, farm products, 
or other goods or commodities.
    (g) Cross references. (1) For provisions relating to deductions of 
employee tax or amounts equivalent to the tax from cash payments for 
agricultural labor, see Sec.  31.3102-1.
    (2) For provisions relating to the time of payment of wages for 
agricultural labor, see Sec.  31.3121(a)-2.
    (3) For provisions relating to records to be kept with respect to 
agricultural labor, see paragraph (b) of Sec.  31.6001-2.
    (h) Effective dates. The provisions of this section apply to any 
payment for agricultural labor made on or after January 1, 1988. For 
rules applicable to any payment for agricultural labor made prior to 
January 1, 1988, see Sec.  31.3121(a)(8)-1 in effect at such time (see 
26 CFR part 31 contained in the edition of 26 CFR parts 30 to 39, 
revised as of April 1, 2006).

[T.D. 6744, 29 FR 8308, July 2, 1964, as amended by T.D. 9266, 71 FR 
35155, June 19, 2006]