[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 5, Volume 3]
[Revised as of January 1, 2008]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 5CFR2637.203]

[Page 623-624]
 
                    TITLE 5--ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
 
                CHAPTER XVI--OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
 
PART 2637_REGULATIONS CONCERNING POST EMPLOYMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST--Table 
 
                    Subpart B_Substantive Provisions
 
Sec. 2637.203  Two-year restriction on a former senior employee's assisting in 

representing as to a matter in which the employee participated personally and 

substantially.

    (a) Basic prohibition of 18 U.S.C. 207(b)(ii). No former Senior 
Employee (see Sec. 2637.102(a)(6)), within two years after terminating 
employment by the United States, shall knowingly represent or aid, 
counsel, advise, consult, or assist in representing any other person by 
personal presence at any formal or informal appearance, (1) before the 
United States, (2) in connection with any particular Government matter 
involving a specific party, (3) in which matter he or she participated 
personally and substantially.
    (b) Limitation to ``representational'' assistance by ``personal 
presence'' at an appearance. Section 207(b)(ii) is limited to assistance 
``in representing'' another person by ``personal presence'' at an 
``appearance'' before the United States. Different in scope from 
sections 207(a) and 207(b)(i), it does not apply to assistance in 
connection with an oral or written communication made with an intent to 
influence which does not involve an appearance. Nor does it bar 
assistance in preparation for either a formal or informal personal 
appearance or an appearance by written submission in a formal proceeding 
where the former employee is not personally present before the 
Government or a Government employee. The provision is designed to 
prevent the former Senior Employee from playing any auxiliary role 
during a negotiation proceeding or similar transaction with the 
Government so that he or she does not appear to be lending personal 
influence to the resolution of a matter and cannot do so in fact.

    Example 1: A former Senior Employee makes suggestions as to the 
content of a letter to be sent to the Government on a matter in which he 
had participated. No violation occurs.

    (c) Managerial and other off-scene assistance. The statute does not 
prohibit a former Senior Employee's advice and assistance to his or her 
organization's representatives which does not involve his or her 
personal presence at an appearance before the Government. The former 
Senior Employee's preparation of documents to be presented in any formal 
or informal proceeding does not constitute personal presence at an 
appearance, even where submission of such a document might technically 
constitute an appearance.

    Example 1: A former Senior Employee attends a hearing on a matter in 
which she had participated personally and substantially while in the 
Government. She speaks with the representative of a private party during 
the hearing. A violation occurs if the former Senior Employee lends 
assistance to the representative in that conversation.
    Example 2: A Senior Justice Department lawyer personally works on an 
antitrust case against Z Company. After leaving the Department, she is 
asked to discuss legal strategy with lawyers representing Z Company on 
that same antitrust case, to write portions of a brief and to direct the 
research of the staff working on the case. Any such aid would not be 
prohibited by the statute, but would likely be prohibited by 
professional disciplinary rules.

    (d) Representational assistance. The statute seeks to prevent a 
former Senior Employee from making unfair use of his or her prior 
governmental position by prohibiting all forms of assistance in the 
representation of another when personally present at an appearance, 
including giving advice as to how the representation in an appearance

[[Page 624]]

should be conducted, supplying information, participating in drafting 
materials, or dealing with forensic or argumentative matters (such as 
testimony, methods of persuasion, or strategy of presentation).
    (e) Measurement of restriction period. The statutory two-year period 
is measured from the date of termination of employment in the Senior 
Employee position held by the former employee when he or she 
participated personally and substantially in the matter involved. (cf. 
Sec. 2637.202(e))
    (f) Other Essential Requirements. All conditions of the statutory 
prohibition must be met. Specifically, the former employee, (1) must 
have been a ``Senior Employee,'' (2) who ``participated personally and 
substantially'' (See Sec. 2637.201(d) of this part) in (3) a 
``particular matter involving a specific party.'' (See subpart Sec. 
2637.201(c) of this part.)
    (g) General Examples:

    Example 1: A Senior Federal Trade Commission Employee, an economist 
by profession, participates in an investigation involving X Company, and 
a proceeding is commenced against X Company based on the investigation. 
After leaving the Commission, he offers to serve as a consultant to the 
lawyers for X Company on certain economic matters involved in the 
proceeding. He attends the proceeding and at the close of each day, 
meets in the lawyers' office to advise them. Such conduct violates the 
statute.
    Example 2: A Senior Employee of the Department of the Treasury 
participates in a number of projects with universities and financial 
research institutions funded by Government grants. After leaving the 
Government, she becomes dean of a graduate school of business which 
performs work under a number of such grants. She may, in the discharge 
of her duties, supervise research and advise as to how funds under such 
a contract should be allocated, whether or not these matters are, as is 
likely, communicated to her former Department by the graduate school's 
representatives. (See Sec. 2637.204.)
    Example 3: A Senior Defense Department official participated 
personally and substantially in a contract award to F Company for 
fighter planes. After leaving the Department, the former official goes 
to work for F Company. Subsequently, F Company desires to renegotiate 
prices and a pension provision on the fighter plane contract, matters in 
which dispute is anticipated. The former official could not attend a 
meeting with Government employees at which such matters will be 
discussed and give assistance to those representing F Company in the 
negotiations. He could generally render advice as long as he remained 
absent from the negotiations.
    Example 4: A Senior Justice Department lawyer participated in an 
antitrust case against Q Company, which is represented by Y law firm. 
Immediately after leaving, the Department, she goes to work with Y law 
firm, and assists at a trial representing Q Company in a different 
antitrust case, not involving the allegations in the Government case. 
Such assistance would not be barred because it does not occur in 
connection with the same particular matter.
    Example 5: A Senior Employee of the Department of Health and Human 
Services leaves to take a university position. The former official's new 
duties include various HHS contracts which the university holds. Some of 
the contracts were awarded by a division within HHS which was under her 
official responsibility. She is not barred from assistance in 
negotiations with respect to such contracts, because the restriction 
applies only to those matters in which she had participated personally 
and substantially, not to those matters for which she had official 
responsibility. Note, however, that any participation by her as a 
representative would be barred by 18 U.S.C. 207(b)(i) as described in 
Sec. 2637.202 of this part. (But see Sec. 2637.204.)
    Example 6: A Senior scientist with the Food and Drug Administration 
was personally and substantially involved in a licensing proceeding 
concerning a specific drug. After leaving the FDA, he is employed by the 
manufacturer of the drug. There he engages in research, indicating that 
the drug is safe and effective, which his employer later presents to FDA 
in connection with the proceeding. He assists during this presentation. 
Such assistance would normally be restricted but may be allowed to the 
extent that the former official is furnishing scientific information to 
the Government. (See 18 U.S.C. 207(f) and Sec. 2637.206 of this part.)
    Example 7: A former Senior Employee of the Federal Communications 
Commission leaves the agency to join a graduate school faculty. In one 
of his courses, which from time to time includes Government employees, 
he discusses, unfavorably to the Commission, a specific licensing case 
in which he was personally and substantially involved. The restriction 
does not apply because the conduct does not occur in connection with any 
representational activities.