[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 7, Volume 2]
[Revised as of January 1, 2008]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 7CFR46.44]

[Page 282-283]
 
                          TITLE 7--AGRICULTURE
 
                        DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 
PART 46_REGULATIONS (OTHER THAN RULES OF PRACTICE) UNDER THE 
PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 46.44  Good delivery.

    Unless otherwise agreed to between the contracting parties, ``Good 
Delivery'' in connection with f.o.b. contracts of purchase and sale 
means that the commodity meets the requirements of the contract at time 
of loading or sale and, if the shipment is handled under normal 
transportation service and conditions, will meet the following 
additional requirements on delivery at the contract destination:
    (a) Lettuce. (1) If the contract specifies a U.S. grade, the lettuce 
may contain an average of not more than 3 percent condition defects, 
including not more than 2 percent decay affecting any portion of the 
head exclusive of wrapper leaves in excess of the destination tolerances 
provided for the applicable grade in the U.S. Standards for Grades of 
Lettuce. (For example, the U.S. No. 1 grade provides a 12 percent 
tolerance for damage at destination. If a lot contains 5 percent damage 
by permanent grade factors, 7 percent of the tolerance can be applied to 
damage by condition factors. The additional 3 percent Good Delivery 
tolerance would then allow a total of 10 percent damage by condition 
factors in this shipment at destination.)
    (2) If the contract does not specify a U.S. grade or percentage of 
condition defects, the lettuce at destination may contain a maximum of 
15 percent, by count, of the heads in any lot which are damaged by 
condition defects, including therein not more than 9 percent serious 
damage of which not more than 5 percent may be decay affecting any 
portion of the head exclusive of wrapper leaves. Sales made on a 
percentage of a U.S. grade, without specifying the percentage of 
condition defects separately from the permanent defects, fall under this 
provision, and the lettuce may not contain more than a total of 15 
percent condition defects at destination. However, if the condition 
defects are specified, provision No. 3 will apply.
    (3) If the contract specifies a percentage of individual or combined 
condition defects, the lettuce at destination may contain either of the 
following, whichever is greater:
    (i) One and one-half times the specified percentage of damage or 
serious damage by condition defects: Provided, That, if serious damage 
is not specified, one-half of the allowance at destination may be 
serious damage, including therein not more than one-quarter of the total 
allowance may be

[[Page 283]]

decay affecting any portion of the head exclusive of wrapper leaves. 
(For example, a lot sold as ``16 percent tipburn'' could have a total of 
24 percent damage by tipburn at destination, including not more than 12 
percent serious damage of which not more than 6 percent may be decay 
affecting any portion of the head exclusive of wrapper leaves.) or
    (ii) Up to 15 percent, by count, of the heads in any lot which are 
damaged by condition defects, including therein not more than 9 percent 
serious damage of which not more than 5 percent may be decay affecting 
any portion of the head exclusive of wrapper leaves.

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, condition defects will be 
considered to be damage as defined in the U.S. Standards for Lettuce.
    (4) If the contract clearly indicates by descriptive terms that the 
lettuce is of inferior quality, larger allowances for damage by 
condition defects than those specified above will be applied.
    (5) If the buyer and the seller agree to percentages for defects at 
destination, higher or lower than those specified above, such 
percentages will determine whether good delivery is made.

[26 FR 12209, Dec. 21, 1961. Redesignated at 28 FR 7067, July 11, 1963]

                    Misrepresentation or Misbranding