[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 32, Volume 1]
[Revised as of January 1, 2008]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 32CFR22.420]

[Page 81-82]
 
                       TITLE 32--NATIONAL DEFENSE
 
              CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
 
PART 22_DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS_AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION--Table of Contents
 
     Subpart D_Recipient Qualification Matters_General Policies and 
                               Procedures
 
Sec.  22.420  Pre-award procedures.

    (a) The appropriate method to be used and amount of effort to be 
expended in deciding the qualification of a potential recipient will 
vary. In deciding on the method and level of effort, the grants officer 
should consider factors such as:
    (1) DoD's past experience with the recipient;
    (2) Whether the recipient has previously received cost-type 
contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements from the Federal 
Government; and
    (3) The amount of the prospective award and complexity of the 
project to be carried out under the award.
    (b) There is no DoD-wide requirement to obtain a pre-award credit 
report, audit, or any other specific piece of information. On a case-by-
case basis, the grants officer will decide whether there is a need to 
obtain any such information to assist in deciding whether the recipient 
meets the standards in Sec.  22.415 (a), (b), and (c).
    (1) Should the grants officer in a particular case decide that a 
pre-award credit report, audit, or survey is needed, he or she should 
consult first with the appropriate grants administration office 
(identified in Sec.  22.710), and decide whether pre-existing surveys or 
audits of the recipient, such as those of the recipient's internal 
control systems under OMB Circular A-133 \5\ will satisfy the need (see 
Sec.  22.715(a)(1)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Electronic copies may be obtained at Internet site http://
www.whitehouse.gov/OMB. For paper copies, contact the Office of 
Management and Budget, EOP Publications, 725 17th St. NW., New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) If, after consulting with the grants administration office, the 
grants officer decides to obtain a credit report, audit, or other 
information, and the report or other information discloses that a 
potential recipient is delinquent on a debt to an agency of the United 
States Government, then:
    (i) The grants officer shall take such information into account when 
determining whether the potential recipient is qualified with respect to 
the grant or cooperative agreement; and
    (ii) If the grants officer decides to make the award to the 
recipient, unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise, the 
grants officer shall delay the award of the grant or cooperative 
agreement until payment is made or satisfactory arrangements are made to 
repay the debt.
    (c) In deciding whether a recipient is otherwise qualified and 
eligible in accordance with the standard in Sec.  22.415(d), the grants 
officer shall ensure that the potential recipient:
    (1) Is not identified in the Governmentwide Excluded Parties List 
System (EPLS) as being debarred, suspended, or otherwise ineligible to 
receive the award. In addition to being a requirement for every new 
award, note that checking the EPLS also is a requirement for subsequent 
obligations of additional funds, such as incremental funding actions, in 
the case of pre-existing awards to institutions of higher education, as 
described at 32 CFR 22.520(e)(5). The grants officer's responsibilities 
include (see the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.425 and 180.430, as 
implemented by the Department of Defense at 2 CFR 1125.425) checking the 
EPLS for:
    (i) Potential recipients of prime awards; and
    (ii) A recipient's principals (as defined in OMB guidance at 2 CFR 
180.995, implemented by the Department of Defense in 2 CFR part 1125), 
potential recipients of subawards, and principals of

[[Page 82]]

those potential subaward recipients, if DoD Component approval of those 
principals or lower-tier recipients is required under the terms of the 
award (e.g., if a subsequent change in a recipient's principal 
investigator or other key person would be subject to the DoD Component's 
prior approval under 32 CFR 32.25(c)(2), 33.30(d)(3), or 
34.15(c)(2)(i)).
    (2) Has provided all certifications and assurances required by 
Federal statute, Executive order, or codified regulation, unless they 
are to be addressed in award terms and conditions at the time of award 
(see Sec.  22.510).
    (3) Meets any eligibility criteria that may be specified in the 
statute authorizing the specific program under which the award is being 
made (see Sec.  22.210(a)(2)).
    (d) Grants officers shall obtain each recipient's Taxpayer 
Identification Number (TIN, which may be the Social Security Number for 
an individual and Employer Identification Number for a business or non-
profit entity) and notify the recipient that the TIN is being obtained 
for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent amounts that 
may arise out of the recipient's relationship with the Government. 
Obtaining the TIN and so notifying the recipient is a statutory 
requirement of 31 U.S.C. 7701, as amended by the Debt Collection 
Improvement Act of 1996 (section 31001(i)(1), Pub. L. 104-134).

[63 FR 12164, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 49464, Aug. 23, 2005; 
72 FR 34988, June 26, 2007]